Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Червоні карпатські гори.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Червоні карпатські гори.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2015 at 04:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info The Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Zakarpattia Oblast, Ukraine, created by Vian - uploaded by Vian - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support Very nice. --Yann (talk) 08:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support Great! --Laitche (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support WOW --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Color banding in the sky, especially at left, and looks unnatural to me. This is discussible. But what is not is the following: please dear reviewers, be more careful in reviews, how can you support as FP such a picture, with at least 6 very visible dustspots in the sky ???? I'm afraid we need to be more serious in assessing, I recommend, for those who don't know, some stages at the QIC pages...--Jebulon (talk) 11:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Info Perhaps that banding is caused by jpeg compression, I can remove the banding with Photoshop but when save it as jpeg, the banding appear again. (Tiff is no problem.) --Laitche (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment There is so big wow for me that I didn't noticed the little qualities issues, great and fp even with those qualities issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose This kind of hemisphere-stratosphere border can be seen above 15-20 km, here original curve was moved so far to show up the banding, beside at least 3 smudges in the sky. Main oppose is : its not real. --Mile (talk) 17:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Unnatural colors (sky), too pale. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Per others; unnatural color. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment A pity… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Info I removed many light dustspots and tried to minimize banding problem. Please check and revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- A real improvement, thank you very much Ivar --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment I support (although very weak) my suggested crop. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't want to crop the work of an other photographer and I don't want an alternative too, thanks. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose for a FP, the colors are not realistic enough. --Hubertl 06:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Support die farben wirken unnatürlich und genau davon lebt das Bild. Gerade das gefällt mir. Es muß nicht immer alles realistisch sein, wir akzeptieren ja auch Panoramen und HDR. --Ralf Roleček 09:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly the art of photography is a visual art. (genau die Kunst der fotografie ist eine visuelle kunst). Successful here. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Support I love it! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- I
Support (although very very weak) due to majestic composition. Almost a painting! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose The black layer in the top and the purple touch in the clouds make it too unrealistic to me, sorry Poco2 17:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)