Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Иультинский район.jpg

File:Иультинский район.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2015 at 16:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Иультинский район.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Иультинский район.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Iultinsky area, created by Шабанов - uploaded by Шабанов - nominated by Bakuresearch -- Bakuresearch (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bakuresearch (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, border and signature must be removed. Jpeg compression a bit strong: loss of detail. --Kadellar (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

• I still oppose, sorry, also per KoH. --Kadellar (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support This one is worth to save. So nice scenery from Russia. Border removed, watermark also, jpeg as before. Let give photo a try. --Mile (talk) 18:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Maybe is tilted !? --Mile (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  weak support I am probably neutral on the picture alone as it has a technical quality a bit below the high FP landscape bar. But for me, the location is a mitigating factor. I do not think we have much other pictures from this very remote and thinly populated area of Russia. So value put it just above the FP threshold for me. Maybe I am also touched on a soft spot; it reminds me of a small settlement in Northwest Greenland I once visited. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:07, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I don't find the composition very interesting; in particular, I think the lower crop cuts off the water in an awkward place. Perhaps a lower framing to include more foreground and less sky would be better. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Croped to rule of thirds.--Mile (talk) 06:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 14:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose or at least an outstanding composition or at least an outstanding quality, here both are ok but not enough featured -- Christian Ferrer 21:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)