Commons:Bots/Requests/Hazard-Bot 8
Hazard-Bot (talk · contribs)
Operator: Hazard-SJ (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Tagging "broken redirects" in the file namespace, as "broken" (they aren't really broken since they have no target) by CommonsDelinker. I currently have a script running daily to list such files at User:Hazard-Bot/Broken redirects (see its history for more details), but it would be better to just have the bot tag them than list them to be tagged/deleted.
Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily
Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute):Not necessary (few edits daily)
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): No
Programming language(s): Python
Hazard-SJ ✈ 00:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Discussion
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Tagging with a maintenance category? Yeah that looks cleaner than using a list page. Fine by me. --Dschwen (talk) 14:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, I meant tagging for speedy deletion (unless there is a better suggestion). Generally (or maybe in all cases), the file was renamed, then the renamed file deleted. When CommonsDelinker goes around making it's replacements, It changes "#REDIRECT [[File:Title.ext]]" to "#REDIRECT ", which is unusable, and in general, redirects to a deleted page should be deleted. Hazard-SJ ✈ 02:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, sure. But commons delinker should be fixed sometime. --Dschwen (talk) 21:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, I meant tagging for speedy deletion (unless there is a better suggestion). Generally (or maybe in all cases), the file was renamed, then the renamed file deleted. When CommonsDelinker goes around making it's replacements, It changes "#REDIRECT [[File:Title.ext]]" to "#REDIRECT ", which is unusable, and in general, redirects to a deleted page should be deleted. Hazard-SJ ✈ 02:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
If there no objections, I think task should be approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Approved. --Dschwen (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)