Commons:Bots/Requests/FVCBot
Operator: Eatcha (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
The tasks would be the exact process that is described here. Currently the bot focuses on the featuring process and de-listing process. Please Note that this bot uses the source code of User:FSCBot, with minor modifications to adjust it for COM:FVC.
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought:
List Of tasks:
- Add voting results to nominations by counting the oppose and support votes (supports 90 template)
- Edit the title of the nominations, whether they were featured or not
- Add the newly promoted videos to the category defined in the nomination.
- Add the template {{FV promoted}} to the video description page.
- Add the video to the chronological list of featured videos.
- Add the template {{FVpromotion|File:XXXXX.webm}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- Move the nomination from Commons:Featured video candidates/candidate list to Commons:Featured video candidates/Log/November 2024.
Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic and supervised by participants at COM:FVC, voting process is manual and counting and closing will be done by this bot.
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): 3 runs a day (5:00, 13:00, 21:00 UTC)
Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): Default pywikipedia setting
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Yes
Programming language(s): Python
Eatcha (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
This question is not related to this bot, what is the maximum allowed rate ? Any approved bot with more than 86400 edits per day ? -- Eatcha (talk) 11:22, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- The maximum allowed rate, on the technical side (rather than the community side), is as long as you don't force SRE to notice you you're probably fine; ans yes, SRE has taken bots down before. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Please make a test run. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Please consider this request withdrawn for now. The orginator of the request have asked to be indef blocked, and have deleted associated accounts offsite. While I may have access to the bot account, I do not currently plan to take it over. -- KTC (talk) 22:10, 12 June 2019 (UTC)- Please Wait, I had some troubles but I think I'm okay now. All my repositories on GitHub are live now. -- Eatcha (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Please elaborate which kind of trouble there has been. --Krd 12:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Krd: I was leaving wikimedia projects forever, due to some DRs that I lost as you know. I was also blocked for filing too many speedy deletion requests in a short time, which I filed to delete all my uploads to stop getting more DRs. I didn't noticed your question as It's in between the comments and I was busy working on other 2 bots (To review YouTube videos and one for an other wiki) . Please ping me next time you have a question. -- Eatcha (talk) 04:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have to say that the DR notices at your talk page are concerning, and leaving the project in a rush in my opinion also isn't a good start for a bot operator. I'd appreciate if this bot could be operated by a team to avoid possible disruption. Also I'd like to request to watch your requests, as I'm not going to use ping with every edit here. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Vote counting test run result. -- KTC (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Full on test run bot internal log and associated account contributions. -- KTC (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- All maintainers of QICbot, VICbot and FPCBot are included in the list of maintainer on tools-forge. They can do what ever they want. I will try not to repeat this again, but it happens again this will not cause any disruption as the source is now distributed on 4 sites. I'm am fine to see KTC as co-bot-op. If she is okay with it. She can be trusted more than me per her talk-page which shows she is serving as a member of Wikimedia Foundation elections committee -- Eatcha (talk) 06:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
If there are no objections, I think bot status should be granted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)