Commons:Bots/Requests/Cewbot
Operator: Kanashimi (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Add photo links on TAIBNET of species. The images are licensed under {{Cc-by-nd-2.5}}.
Automatic or manually assisted: automatic
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Weekly
Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 12 per minute
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): No
Programming language(s): JavaScript (source code)
Kanashimi (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Discussion
Please make a few test uploads. How many images do you plan to upload in total? --Krd 14:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- I am writing codes now. There should be thousands of images, and increasing aperiodically. --Kanashimi (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have do some test edits. There are 21K+ images. Please review the result and give me some suggestions, thank you. --Kanashimi (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- As you stated above, http://taibnet.sinica.edu.tw/eng/policy.php says the site is under cc-by-2.5 unless otherwise noted. Sadly all the source pages of the images you transferred note different, i.e. cc-by-nc. Please let me know if I miss something. --Krd 11:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your speedy reply. Well... You are right, although the messages on the guest board of TaiBNET says it is OK to use the data in Wikipedia articles. I think the main concern is that they do not want the works being used in a business product. But there are many images in the site. If I change the bot task; for the species exist in commons, giving a link to TaiBNET, is this a good idea? --Kanashimi (talk) 13:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I don't get that, please say again in different words or give an example. --Krd 14:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- For example, add a link:
- to Category:Albara reversaria, and add a link:
- to Category:Neohelota. --Kanashimi (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Understood. I'm not sure if this is helpful, awaiting additional opinions. --Krd 14:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I will wait for some time if other contributors have any advice. --Kanashimi (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I oppose external links to non-free images from our category pages. If someone wants non-free images, they can easily search. --99of9 (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Understood. I'm not sure if this is helpful, awaiting additional opinions. --Krd 14:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I don't get that, please say again in different words or give an example. --Krd 14:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your speedy reply. Well... You are right, although the messages on the guest board of TaiBNET says it is OK to use the data in Wikipedia articles. I think the main concern is that they do not want the works being used in a business product. But there are many images in the site. If I change the bot task; for the species exist in commons, giving a link to TaiBNET, is this a good idea? --Kanashimi (talk) 13:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- As you stated above, http://taibnet.sinica.edu.tw/eng/policy.php says the site is under cc-by-2.5 unless otherwise noted. Sadly all the source pages of the images you transferred note different, i.e. cc-by-nc. Please let me know if I miss something. --Krd 11:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am concerned by the very first upload the bot did: File:Neohelota_helleri,_海氏大吸木甲;_馬承漢_2016-08-07_TaiBNET_21822.jpg is marked as CC-BY-2.5, but on the source page it is CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on commons. --99of9 (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Ah, I see this was also raised above. --99of9 (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- I find there are many sample photos in the site that wiki do not have. So how about just add a link to the page contains the sample photo? I think this can help the visitor who want to know more about the species. --Kanashimi (talk) 12:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- If that's the case, why don't we add links to google images? No, advertising for non-free media is not within our scope. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
I see no support for the intended task; if there is nothing to add I'd suggest to close this as declined. --Krd 13:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. --Krd 10:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)