Category talk:Quality images by Pleclown

Quality images?

Hello. I have uploaded a few images as IQ candidates just to see what the QI standards are (I need to get better!) and have noticed that a number of Commoners are uploading dozens of images and promoting each other's images. The quality of some images promoted is poor. You have, I notice, many images of the Longines event promoted. How is this acceptable within Commons QI guidelines? Are all of them Commons 'most valuable images'? I don't think so, with the rider's face obscured in many. You have some super QI promotions, but also quite a number that I cannot understand why they have been promoted. I also have noticed that you promote many of MattBuck's quite ordinary images. I have just looked at his most recent QI candidates and Declined most of them. I see that you are a Commons Administrator and I wonder if there is any monitoring of the promotion process? --Charles (talk) 09:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)