Category talk:Quality images by Georgfotoart

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe bei Bittkau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe bei Bittkau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schelldorf 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 22:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe bei Ferchland 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 22:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe bei Ferchland 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed. --Ermell 20:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip - better now? --Georgfotoart 10:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip - better now? --Georgfotoart 10:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip - better now? --Georgfotoart 10:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the line was so slow --Georgfotoart 10:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe Pegel Ferchland und Fähre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
tilted cw? --ArildV 19:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bug fixed, thank you --Georgfotoart 12:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. Ok now --ArildV 16:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kali und Kalk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There seems to be a dust spot or something in the left part of the sky. --Plozessor 03:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bug fixed, thank you --Georgfotoart 10:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorfkirche Detershagen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe bei Ferchland 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roter Brückengraben 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DDR-Schachtdeckel, Burg K-M-Str.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Views from Kapaunenberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gli-Pa-Gen, Gli-Bu, 26 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windpark Schermen 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windpark Schermen 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L 54 Hohenseeden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is pretty noisy/grainy. --Plozessor 14:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version Thank you --Georgfotoart 20:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx, good now! --Plozessor 04:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L 54 Hohenseeden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Optische Telegraphenstation 10 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Optische Telegraphenstation 10 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC) Georgfotoart (talk) 20:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]