Category talk:Mixed flowers

Unidentified?

I'm not sure this should be in "unidentified" categories. It seems that even identified groups of multiple different flowers would be useful to be categorized as a mixed group. Anyone know why this category has been listed as unidentified? (I only put it back in Category:Unidentified flowers because it was in Category:Unidentified plants.) --Closeapple (talk) 19:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I agree. However, there is a need for a category of assorted and unidentified plants. Solution? --Averater (talk) 09:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

It seems to me that or Category:Unidentified mixed flowers or Category:Mixed unidentified flowers would make sense. But see what kind of "sense" happened at Category talk:Unidentified flowers, where people decided to merge all flowers into plants because having 2 categories would somehow cause images to be removed from one or the other, even after I said that a file could be in both. --Closeapple (talk) 10:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

I want to separate these kind of images:

• 
  All identified (but different)
• 
  Some identified (all identifiable)
• 
  None identified (nor identifiable)

For me this has nothing to do with if there are flowers in the image or not, but with the mixed part. I'd like some mixed plants category and a unidentified mixed plant category. Thereby maybe clumping together the last two (some and none identified). --Averater (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)