Category talk:Mahtra Nature Reserve

@Estopedist1: see my previous edit comment. If you make this into a subcatgory of two municipalities then this implies that every member image in this category depicts both of these two municipalities which is not true. E.g. Järlepa järv is in Rapla vald, and not in Kose vald. If you also remove particular image from municipality category then accurate information is just gone. If I want to query images of a municipality based on its category and subcategories then currently I also get images that depict neighbouring municipalities. This is messy, and can be easily avoided by categorizing each member image accurately instead. 2001:7D0:81DB:1480:95BA:9A69:A119:B26D 07:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

after reconsiderating I agree with you. At first place, I don't like to mass-create categories like "Mahtra Nature Reserve (unidentified location)", but "Foo Protected area (unidentified location)" seems actually OK. And some protected areas are located in five municipalities, so it clutters municipalities categories as well Estopedist1 (talk) 07:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't quite follow. What would be the point of categories like "Mahtra Nature Reserve (unidentified location)" and what this has got to do with whether this category is a subcategory of some municipality? 2001:7D0:81DB:1480:95BA:9A69:A119:B26D 09:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)