Category talk:IMO 9087477

There is ab Problem with this category, Nils Dacke and Robin Hood changed names in December 2014 [1], [2]. At the moment, in both categories are pictures which are belonging in the other, but how to name the new categories? In the german wikipedia we have the rule, that the year of built is to complete, but this is identical in both cases (1995). At first, I will put all pictures into the IMO category. HenSti (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Solved the problem, I hope. Wrong IMO numbers for the ships changed, accoring Equasis. The parties to the Equasis MoU are members of the Supervisory Committee, with the IMO, as the main international regulator, having observer status on the Committee. The role of the Committee is to supervise the management of Equasis, and to decide on policy matters related to the operation and future development of the system. The cost of Equasis is shared equally between the members of the Committee. Maritime administrations worldwide are encouraged to participate in the Equasis Supervisory Committee in order to ensure a broad geographical coverage. --Stunteltje (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Evidence: Even MarineTraffic uses IMO 9087477 for the ROBIN HOOD, and that site uses the AIS data, sent from the ship. [3] --Stunteltje (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure the current version really is useful. Now we have pictures of the ship Category:IMO 9087465 with both names, but when you open the categories, you don't know which ship is which of them. I don't know why my editing is reverted over and opver again. HenSti (talk) 10:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

I realy don't understand the confusion. IMO 9087477 is the ROBIN HOOD In Service/Commission (since 28/11/1995) and IMO 9087465 is the NILS DACKE, In Service/Commission (since 02/10/1995) according Equasis and also Marine Traffic. Without any name-change. --Stunteltje (talk) 17:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)