User talk:Cambalachero/Archivo 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Cambalachero/Archivo 1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 16:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derechos de autor en colombia[edit]

Los cambios que se abrian de realizarse es que el decreto de los derechos de autor que estan en Commons de colombia ya se an actualizado y le han agregado mas contenido de derechos de autor a la ley de derechos de autor LEY 719 DE 2001 Diciembre 24 Por el cual se modifican la Leyes 23 de 1982 y 44 de 1993 y se dictan otras disposiciones. Son necesarias en commons.--Elberth 00001939 (talk) 23:56, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dayan 9th Brigade 1956[edit]

Gracias por preocuparte tan diligentemente por esa imagen, resulta que ya estoy buscando una traducción de la descripción ya que no sé hebreo, cosa que requiere tiempo, así que te pido paciencia, que las cosas no se hacen en 5 minutos. En cuanto a los apartados que mencionas, decirte que al usar el Commons Helper automáticamente generan esas descripciones. ¿Acaso alguna es incorrecta? No, pero sí coincido contigo en que es necesario añadir toda la información posible, y en ello estoy.

Por último, te pido que te dirijas a mí en español, ya que aunque puedo leer y entender perfectamente el inglés como puedes comprobar, encuentro absurdo que un hablante nativo de español como tú se dirija a mí en inglés, primero porque Commons es un proyecto plurilingüe donde ningún idioma queda supeditado a otro, y segundo porque ya nos conocemos de la Wikipedia como para andarnos con formalismos. Es una petición que te hago como gesto de buena voluntad, aunque entiendo que estés en tu derecho de obviar mi petición, como yo lo estoy de hacerlo con tus comentarios de ser así. Saludos, Kordas 19:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HavA0000.jpg[edit]

I removed the speedy delete copyright violation notice you put on Image:HavA0000.jpg; from previous discussions we have been allowing photos of 3 dimensional floats in public parades, so I dispute that it is an obvious speedy deleletion candidate. If you think this should be deleted as a copyright problem, please list it at Commons:Deletion requests for discussion. Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 19:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lucio Mancilla Obligado.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Domingo Cavallo.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Domingo Cavallo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo 09:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Cacique_Junchar.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Cacique_Junchar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lokal_Profil 20:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Logo_de_Telefe.PNG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Logo_de_Telefe.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

190.31.173.148 04:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ArgentummPara fijarse.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Village pump[edit]

If you're still having trouble uploading the file, drop me an e-mail and we can see about getting it uploaded. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why so serious?.svg[edit]

This file is in scope even it's not used on any article page. Commons:Project scope says: "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace) of another project, but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (eg of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed." source
--D-Kuru (talk) 22:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Library of Congress[edit]

Gracias por la respuesta. Ya las fotos que descargué de allí fueron borradas por un administrador de Commons. Así pensaba que iba a ser. Yo no quería bajar fotos sin licencia aceptable, pero tenía la dudad porque encontré esa otra imagen de la misma biblioteca. En fin, gracias y buena suerte.--eliasjorge4 (talk) 02:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hey, can you design logo Amanda O as Logo de Telefe.PNG and upload in commons wikipedia?--Hedda Gabler (talk) 10:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A quote to share (Hope you'll like it)[edit]

" 'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt."

Abraham Lincoln and --Mbz1 (talk) 14:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Escudo Buenos Aires.JPG[edit]

File:Escudo Buenos Aires.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Lokal_Profil 19:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Personality rights[edit]

Hola, Belgrano, sabias que estas usando mal la plantilla Template:Personality rights, solo se usa para gente no conocida, no se debe usar si esta persona es conocida, y ya está acostumbrado de que le saquen fotos o que deja o quiere que le saquen una foto. Gracias --190.31.56.130 14:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Por lo menos le podias quitar el marco verde. --190.31.49.167 16:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fan art[edit]

Hi, thanks for your contributions to the Fan art article. I have reverted your addition of the image, and thought I should explain why. While your example is right, and it is a good one, it demonstrates a general point about copyright not protecting an idea. As the article is specifically about fan art, I think the imges used ought to be fan art examples themselves. The image you used is a religious symbol and wasn't produced itself for the purpose of fan art. Maybe there is another example we could use there? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Copyright violation at french wikipedia[edit]

Hi, I marked it as a copyrighted logotype on WP:fr, as there we have a local kind of fair use. Thanks for having sent me a massage about this issue.
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen PCA[edit]

Hola Belgrano, había notado que editaste la foto de fundación del PCA; de ninguna manera pienso revertir, quedó mucho mejor de lo que estaba. Es que la saqué de un libro de 1948 que estuvo "escondido" mucho tiempo en no muy buenas condiciones y no tuvo una conservación adecuada.

Saludos, --Banfield (talk) 01:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Un regalo para el nuevo administrador de sus camaradas...

¡Cambalachero, felicidades! Ya tienes derechos de administrador (biblio) en Commons. Por favor toma unos minutos para leer Commons:Administrators y añadir a tu lista de vigilancia las páginas relacionadas (en particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard y Commons:Deletion requests), antes de lanzarte a borrar y proteger páginas, bloquear cuentas y modificar páginas protegidas, dado que Commons tiene sus propias reglas que pueden diferir de las de otras wikis.

La mayoría de las acciones de un administrador pueden ser deshechas por los demás, salvo la fusión de historiales, por lo que esto último debe realizarse con sumo cuidado.

Recuerda también que Commons es un proyecto multilingüe, puedes usar español si lo deseas. Ten la libertad de entrar a nuestro canal de IRC:#wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:The Simpsons Arcade Game cabinet.jpg[edit]

File:The Simpsons Arcade Game cabinet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hello. I revert your deletion and i open this proposal. I am not a layer at all, but i hope we will not delete image because a very little part contain a copyrighted element. BUt i dont know, feel free to take a look. ~ bayo or talk 20:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Orbis de Wit[edit]

.jpg .JPG

It is a dupe, isn't it? -- Common Good (talk) 19:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With prefix or without: User talk:Common Good#Duplicate template ? -- Common Good (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, the the prefix requirement is a requirement of the dupes tool, not of the tagging proces (and the template handles both). As such, this is not his fault. TheDJ (talk) 23:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

III Día de la Llingua Llïonesa[edit]

Hello, I want to upload a file that is free, but it's cancelled. It was made by a local government, and it could be dowladed from its web for free reproduction. Is there any problem? How must I do it? Thanks. --Auslli (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I got the written permision. Can you tell me the adress of wikipedia for sending it? Thank you.--Auslli (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asociación puntuLLI TLD Domain for Leonese Language[edit]

Hello, In this case, there is a promotional web for reaching a TLD for Leonese language. There you can download the banner and put in in your page. www.puntulli.org. Even, there is a code for it. Can I uploading it? Thank you.--Auslli (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverhampton Wanders[edit]

FYI: You can delete Wolverhampton Wanders now. Regards, Wutsje (talk) 03:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando Ricciard[edit]

Hola Belgrano, te escribo para hacerte una pregunta. Estoy mejorando un artículo en Wikipedia, que es Fernando Ricciardi, pero no he encontrada imágenes libres en Flickr, sin embargo, en una página de un blog, hay fotos de él y yo tengo contacto con el dueño del blog y creo que el me daría permiso para ocuparlas. Ahora, si llegara al conseguírmelas, ¿se podrían subir a Commons?¿Con qué licencia?. Yerson O (talk) 00:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Mendoza_province_COA.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mendoza_province_COA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mendoza_province_COA.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 03:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Chaco_COA.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chaco_COA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 03:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reemplazo universal[edit]

Hola Belgrano, hace un tiempo habías solicitado el reemplazo en todos los proyectos de los escudos de la ciudad y de la provincia de Buenos Aires por imágenes temporales. Hace unas semanas que subí unas nuevas versiones de tales escudos, que, creo, están en condiciones de remplazar a las imágenes temporales.

Por tanto, y como vos podés, te pido el favor de que comandes al CommonsDelinker para que reemplace:

File:Escudo Buenos Aires.JPG por File:Escudo de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires.png,
y File:COA Buenos Aires province.jpg por File:Coat of arms of the Buenos Aires Province.png.

Saludos! Dexxter (talk) 04:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias [1]! Un saludo, Dexxter (talk) 01:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Escudos[edit]

Hola, por favor, al subir escudos de argentina subilos de http://www.angelfire.com/realm/jolle/argentina/mendoza.htm tenemos autorización para subirlos ver User:ALE!/Flags. Y también solicito un reemplazo universal de Image:Flag of San Juan province in Argentina.gif a Image:Flag of San Juan.svg. Y también reemplazar las banderas en GIF [2] por las nuevas SVG [3] . Gracias. --RoyFocker 12 (talk) 00:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reemplazo universal II[edit]

Hola Belgrano! Si, otra vez yo, y para pedirte lo mismo. =) En este caso es para remplazar el "globo mapa" de Argentina que se usa en las Infoboxes de Wikipedia, por la versión vectorizada y sin problemas cartográficos.

Entonces, lo que te estaría pidiendo es el reemplazo universal de:

File:Argentina (orthographic projection).png por este otro
File:Argentina (orthographic projection).svg.

Gracia otra vez por tu ayuda! Un saludo, Dexxter (talk) 08:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, la verdad que te entendí muy poco, por no decir nada =P, pero bueno, al final reemplacé a mano la imagen en .png salvo la que está en Wikipedia en español, porque el artículo está protegido, te pediría el favor de que la reemplaces ahí también.
Sobre la protección del escudo... mirá, entiendo a lo que te referís, pero no lo comparto. La imagen estuvo durante más de tres años y no nada pasó. Pero más que nada es porque no estoy seguro de que esta sea la versión definitiva del escudo. Faltan todavía varias cosas para mejorarlo, por ejemplo, poner gradientes en el gorro y en la cinta, que las puse, pero no sé porqué no se veían en la vista previa. Tampoco me convencen mucho los laureles. Por eso, si el escudo está abierto a la edición tal vez alguien que sepa pueda hacerlo mejor.
Bueno Thialfi, gracias por tu ayuda. Un saludo! Dexxter (talk) 04:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright versus copying[edit]

Hello Belgrano. I am cleaning up after MRDU08 (talk · contribs) and MRDU09 (talk · contribs), who have been indefinitely blocked on both Commons and en.wiki for copyright violations. Many of this user's uploads are clear violations (e.g. photos of beauty pageant contestants) but the user has also frequently uploaded images that were copied and pasted from various websites, notably "Flags of the World" (FOTW). Now, some of those FOTW images (e.g. File:Bandera del Distrito Capital de Paraguay.JPG) are clearly copyrightable from the source, but some others (e.g. File:Bandera de Junín.PNG) are simple geometric figures and therefore ineligible for copyright. However, the user still is guilty of copying JPEG files from that website and uploading them to Commons. Is that allowed per Commons policy, if the image is copyright-ineligible? Thanks, Andrwsc (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. For the really simple flag images, therefore, we should correct the license information. But I will still err on the side caution with respect to flags that are more complex, as the judgement of whether or not it is copyrightable isn't a decision that I want to make as a non-lawyer. I will stop tagging the obviously simple flags, but keep tagging the more complex ones just to get a second set of eyes. Thanks again, Andrwsc (talk) 20:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File renaming[edit]

Belgrano,

I tried to list File:U+500B.svg and File:U+4E2A.svg for renaming, but I can't tell if the request for renames page is still active. If you have a moment, would you be able to perform the moves? Thanks, Rjanag (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. From looking at Commons:MediaMoveBot, it looks like the bot for doing this might actually not be functional yet. Did you try the "click here to move" link in the {rename} template? I can't click it, but since you're an admin you might be able to... Rjanag (talk) 21:57, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. No worries; I just got antsy and re-uploaded the files under the different names, since I don't know how long I would have to wait for the bot to take care of things. If you want, you are free to delete the old ones, or if you need to keep anything from the history (for example, the fact that they were originally uploaded by a different user) you can do whatever you need to do. Rjanag (talk) 02:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question on copyvio issue raising[edit]

You removed my copyvio notice on an image by this edit. Your edit comment suggested i was trying to do something speedily, and perhaps that i was polemic or something. I'm not familiar with deletion processes in Commons, but in wikipedia a copyvio type of notice is not speedy at all, it calls for full deliberation. How may i raise the copyvio issue here in commons, specifically? Or, could you just demonstrate by opening it? The copyright issue for this particular image has been discussed in wikipedia over several weeks, at wikipedia talk of the uploader and elsewhere. I just want to get the wheels in motion here. Doncram (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sweet[edit]

Hola. Creo que está imagen : File:Michael press.jpg tiene copyright, y debería eliminarse. ¿Que te parece? Saludos!!! --BRONSON77 (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo with histogram.JPG[edit]

The photo is not ok, because it contains a non free photography. The programm itselfe is free, but the photo in the programm is not. Yours --Jodo (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hello, You have deleted the photo of Cadbury chocolate bars after request from user:Dodo. Since you are administrator, I would like to ask why do pictures like File:Snickers.jpeg, File:Danusia.JPG, File:Boldo.jpg and File:KitKat chunky.jpg pass Commons' rules for derivate works whereas the photo which I mentioned doesn't. Delta 51 (talk) 08:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you for the information. Delta 51 (talk) 06:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta que me hizo un usuario[edit]

Te traslado lo que me preguntó PabloGlez y no supe responderle. Se lo dije a Kved, pero últimamente no se ha conectado. También lo expuse en el Café, pero no obtuve respuesta. Te agradecería si pudieras atender la consulta de este usuario. Gracias. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bandera de La Pampa[edit]

Hola Belgrano, sé que estarás ocupado con el tema de las elecciones, pero para cuando tengas un poco de tiempo te dejo la tarea de programas al Commons Delinker para un reemplazo universal, esta vez de la bandera de La Pampa. Sería:

Además de las razones estéticas, el reemplazo también es necesario para dejar de usar banderas en formato .gif. Un saludo. --Dexxter (talk) 03:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, yo otra vez... incluyo en el pedido de reemplazo universal al escudo de La Rioja, es decir:

y el de Mendoza:

--Dexxter (talk) 03:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias Belgrano, excelente tu trabajo! --Dexxter (talk) 23:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

This is the bot. All photos after 10 min have licens/date/autor/ --Vizu (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariano Moreno en su mesa de trabajo.jpg[edit]

Hello. In response of your Graphic Lab request, I have fixed your image. Please visit the link above to see your new image. --Jackl (talk) 04:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I used Photoshop, but Gimp will do a fine job too. Gimp is like a free alternative to Photoshop. I tried Hugin, but it didn't work out that good. Cheers. --Jackl (talk) 12:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Procedimiento[edit]

Hola Belgrano. Casualmente vi varias solicitudes al usuario Oriental Knightxz. En realidad lo noté porque afectó a una imágen que él mismo uso en reemplazoo de una que yo agregue en su momento en Batalla de Juncal.

No discuto la necesidad de que se cumpla la norma. Por experiencia, solemos cometer errores en la subida de imágenes al Commons, y no es un tema fácil el de las licencias para el común de los usuarios, aún para aquellos que tratamos de respetar las reglas de juego.

El punto es, considerando la presunción de buena fé, ¿no es posible notificarle del problema sin hacer uso inmediato de una plantilla que hasta donde se implica el borrado automático tras pocos días especialmente cuando se le esta aplicando a un gran número de imágenes lo que le dificultará rastrear las fuentes que utilizó en su momento y analizar o consultar por su viabilidad en Commons? Terminará en un borrado masivo cuando es factible que algunas de esas imágenes sean legítimas. Un aviso previo le dará tiempo, tras lo que se podrá de cualquier manera aplicar la plantilla. Te dejo la inquietud. Saludos, Quijav (talk) 13:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: (Protected "Template:Nopenis": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))[edit]

(Protected "Template:Nopenis": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))

i don't see evidence of "excessive vandalism" in this case?

also; the template is broken; on this user's talkpage:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Grumpy-626

the section edit takes you to the template's edit page not the usertalkpage section

Lx 121 (talk) 21:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for taking the time to explain :) Lx 121 (talk) 03:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Formosa_COA.jpg[edit]

File:Formosa_COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ALE! ¿…? 08:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

viejo amigo[edit]

he vuelto por estos lados je je je. como esta?. le voy a pedir algo, recuerda la foto que ilustraba mi pagina de usuario en wikipedia "Argentummdifrutandoenlaplaya.JPG" ? me la han suprimido porque alegan "personal repository" pero no es asi ya que es solo una fotografia que solo servia para ilustrar esa pagina, y por que no usasarla en algun que otro articulo como por ejemplo "comodidad" jejeje, podria revisar esto? gracias desde ya por supuesto.--Argentumm (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seatraining.jpg[edit]

Hola. Se ha enviado un mail a la dirección indicada de permisos. Debajo puedes encontrar una copia del mensaje.

> Dear Sir or Madam: > > > > Though this communication Fundación Comuniad Valenciana Región Europea gives permission to use the logo of the following European projects. FCVRE is partner and in charge of dissemination activities of these projects. > >

Project name File name Easy EastEsecQuadr.jpg Energy Neighbourhoods Logo va2.gif IEC-SME Español.jpeg Path-to-res Image005.jpeg Rurale Evolution Ruraleevolution.gif U@Marenostrum Marenostrum.jpeg VOice Voice_:final_rgb1.jpeg i-set I-set 72 dpi.jpeg Infomigra Logo-infomigra.png Regioclima Regioclimaweb.jpeg Chord Logofinal.jpeg Zeroplus Zeroplus.jpg.jpg Seatraining Seatraining.jpeg

Best regards

Fundacion Comunidad Valenciana- Región Europea

Fundación Comunidad Valenciana - Región Europea Rue de la Loi 227 / 227 Wetstraat B-1040 Bruxelles / Brussel Tel : +32 2 282 41 60 Fax: +32 2 282 41 61

Te ruego deshagas la eliminación de la imagen o me indiques qué otro problema tiene. Gracias, saludos, Akkol

--Akkol81 (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, comprendo. De todas formas, tengo constancia de que desde la FCVRE se ha enviado el mail a esta dirección, porque me han puesto en copia. ¿qué más debo hacer? Saludos,

--Akkol81 (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Archi Spotter ‎[edit]

I'm just trying to get your take on the Archi Spotter ‎situation. You deleted the 40+ uploads from flickr, even though they were licensed CC-BY and blocked Archi Spotter. Additionally, we have received 43 e-mails from this user (one for each image presumably) via OTRS. It seems odd to delete CC-BY images, and block a user for uploading said free images. I understand that there was also a copyright notice attached to the images, © CivicArts / Eric R. Kuhne & Associates, http://www.civicarts.com. I guess it is a matter of does CC-BY trump that (and from the looks of the OTRS permission, the copyright owner intended to release these images under the free license). So yeah... just wanted to get your side of things. Looks like the 40+ images should be undeleted, if not based on passing flickr review, but also from OTRS permission. -Andrew c (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bandera de Buenos Aires ‎[edit]

Hola Belgrano, yo otra vez, y solicitandote otro reemplazo universal. En este caso es la bandera de la ciudad de Buenos Aires,

Las razones son dos, primero es un diseño que se acerca mucho más al oficial, y en segundo lugar es para dejar de usar imágenes en formato .gif, que no se ven bien como miniaturas.

Un saludo! --Dexxter (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SEO[edit]

Hola Belgrano, ¿qué tal?. Recurro a ti como administrador, por esta imagen File:SEO-color+web.jpg, que me parece que supera el umbral de originalidad, y además lleva un extraño permiso, pero no se muy bien como actuar. ¿Me podrías ayudar? Muchas gracias. --Erfil (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Muchísimas gracias por encargarte del caso. Un saludo --Erfil (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bannerseo.jpg[edit]

Hi, I don't think that kind of deletion helps. You have deleted as copyvio, but the uploader has provided the source link himself, saying that he was the author of the file (to be precised). What was needed was a proper permission for the file (which the user might have been able to provide), not a brutal deletion. To me, it doesn't look like an "obvious copyright violation" (unless you assume the user is lying) and did not warrant a speedy deletion. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes SEO/BirdLife[edit]

Hola Belgrano, Creo que no debo haber rellenado correctamente algo para que me borreis los archivos que subí ayer sobre SEO/BirdLife. Lo siento, soy novato en esto. El caso es que yo no soy sólo socio de SEO, también soy trabajador de SEO y por tanto lo que hago corre por cuenta del Directo Ejecutivo, que es en quien delega la Junta Directiva. Con esto quiero decir que sí que tengo permiso explícito para subir el logo. Lo que no me queda claro es qué tipo de documentación tengo que aportar para demoStrarlo.¿Podrías ayudarme? En el caso de la imagen "bannerseo" es peor aún puesto que aunque figura en la web el autor en todo caso, no solo de la composición sino de todas las imágenes, soy yo mismo. ¿Que debo hacer para poder subir correctamente? ¿Como puedo demostrarlo? ¿Os envío las fotos originales sin montar? Gracias de antemano y un saludo --Adalberti80 (talk) 08:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allaincepn.JPG[edit]

Hey Belgrano, you deleted an image I was in the process of tagging for copyright violation, which led me to recreate the deleted file. Could you please delete the page? Talk about edit conflicts. –blurpeace (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While I was in edit mode you had deleted the file. I didn't get an edit conflict warning, but I guess that doesn't apply to deletions? Odd. –blurpeace (talk) 09:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Cambalachero!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 08:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta[edit]

Hola Belgrano. Tenes buen manejo de Commons y quiza puedas sacarme un par de dudas:

Estoy preparando un artículo sobre el manco Mordeille. Aparece en el cuadro La Reconquista de Buenos Aires de Fouqueray. Vi que la pintura estuvo subida (La Reconquista de Buenos Aires, oleo de Charles Fouqueray, 1909.jpg) y en el 2007 lo borraron aparentemente porque el autor murió en 1956 (no pasaron 70 años de su muerte).

Ahora bien, el cuadro fue pintado en 1909, pertenece al acervo nacional y público, se encuentra en el Museo Histórico Nacional, creo que no es correcto, razonable, ni de sentido común el criterio aplicado, pero no soy obviamente experto en las reglas, usos y costumbres de commons.

No cabe aplicar "Reproducción de una pintura que esta en el dominio público debido a su antiguedad" o "Publicado por primera vez en Argentina hace más de 25 años (ley 11723) Dominio público." ???

Si es así, podrá recuperarse el archivo? Tengo una foto mía pero la verdad es muy mala.

Respecto de los alcances del último licenciamiento, "Publicado por primera vez en Argentina hace más de 25 años", ¿habilita para utilizar por ejemplo un escaneo de página o imágen incluído en un libro editado antes de 1984? ¿Si tuvo ediciones posteriores?

Saludos y gracias, Quijav (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your assistance please...[edit]

The record shows you deleted File:Ahmed Al Darbi.jpg. But it doesn't say where the deletion of this file was discussed. I'd like to read that discussion, and would appreciated you informing me of where to find that discussion.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 20:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I got your reply.
After I left this note I checked WhatLinksHere/File:Ahmed Al Darbi.jpg. It seems the only discussion of this image is my question, here.
I checked your dicdef. No offense, but I do not regard your interpretation as clear cut. When I posed my question on the village pump I thought that those with an opinion would weigh in there. I didn't expect an undiscussed deletion. And I didn't expect to learn of that deletion through the wikipedia's commons delinker bot.
So, from your dicdef, what do you think "released" meant, if it didn't mean "released into the public domain"?
Public domain#Copyright says:
It is commonly believed by non-lawyers that it is impossible to put a work into the public domain. Although copyright law generally does not provide any statutory means to "abandon" copyright so that a work can enter the public domain, this does not mean that it is impossible or even difficult, only that the law is somewhat unclear.
Consider Omar Khadr. At first the there were only two photos of him. They were widely republished, but with no credits. When they were printed with credits, those credits were contradictory, and frankly not credible. One as a young child, and another from when he was a young teenager. It took us ages to trace down where the images came from. It turned out that his family had handed them out to reporters at a hearing, or reasonable equivalent. They had handed them out without condition. This is one reason why, when they were published, they were generally treated as if they were in the public domain. Handing the photos out to strangers, without condition, was treated as the equivalent of declaring that the images were being put into the public domain.
IANAL, but aren't those publications correct that routinely used the images without credit, as if the distribution of images, to strangers, without conditions, amounted to placing them in the public domain?
We eventually were able to contact members of his family. His sister was confused that there was any controversy over whether we were free to use the images. She thought that by the family's manner of distributing the photos had already disclaimed all rights to the photos. Geo Swan (talk) 21:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

José Rondeau 2.jpg[edit]

Hola, como estás Belgrano. Te quería consultar sobre un comentario de edición en José Rondeau 2.jpg en el que das a entender que en caso de no tener identificado el autor, y a pesar de que hayan pasado 190 años de la creación de la obra, la misma tendría que haber sido eliminada. Me gustaría si sos tan amable, de aclararme en que te basas para esa afirmación. Un saludo, y gracias. --Zeroth (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Entendido. Por supuesto que yo también me alivié cuando encontraste los datos de la imágen. Cuando subí esta imágen, hace tiempo ya, era bastante nuevo en el proyecto y cometí varios errores como la torpeza de colocarme como autor cuando lo único que había hecho era escanearla de un libro. Bueno, en definitiva, me alegro que hayas encontrado los datos y gracias por tu explicación. Un abrazo, --Zeroth (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?[edit]

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Foto autografiada de Perón.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Foto autografiada de Perón.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No consta en qué medio gráfico y en qué fecha se publicó por primera vez esta imagen.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: Image:Perón y evita en acto de gala.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón y evita en acto de gala.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

¿Tiene usted información acerca de la vigencia de los derechos de autor de quien iluminó esta fotografía? ferbr1 (talk) 11:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón e Isabel en el Colon.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón e Isabel en el Colon.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón elegante.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón elegante.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón y Evita.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón y Evita.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Peron y Lollobrigida.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Peron y Lollobrigida.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón y Evita en sus inicios.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón y Evita en sus inicios.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón joven.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón joven.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón hace la venia.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón hace la venia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Perón cantando el himno.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Perón cantando el himno.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:Regreso de Perón.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Regreso de Perón.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

ferbr1 (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status[edit]

You need to respect this.--Elvey (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I think I was complaining about that or a similar OLD edit. Sorry.--Elvey (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Hello, would it be possible for you, to translate these pictures and categorise them?:

Thank you very much! --++gardenfriend++ (talk) 09:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cambalachero/Archivo_1&oldid=52997777"