MediaWiki talk:Botcheck.js

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
MediaWiki:Botcheck.js forms part of the MediaWiki interface and can only be edited by administrators, stewards and interface editors.
To request a change to MediaWiki:Botcheck.js, add {{Edit request}} to this talk page, followed by a description of your request.
Called via a special link in Template:BotMoveToCommons, to validate bot moves.

Undo latest revision[edit]

{{editprotected}} Please undo the latest revision regarding NOTOC. Now, the edit summary is not being inserted automatically, and I receive the following error in Firefox's Error Console:

Error: __NOTOC__ is not defined Source File: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Botcheck.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript Line: 21

Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 08:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for help on COM:AN#MediaWiki:Botcheck.js two days ago, but nobody replied so far. --Leyo 10:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It seems it has already been corrected. --Mormegil (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

autoreplacement for most common CommonsHelper annoyance[edit]

Can you add a replacement for {{GFDL}} <!-- Templates "Template:Lizenzdesign4", "Template:Lizenzumstellung" were used in the original description page as well , but do not appear to exist on commons. --> to automatically be substituted by {{GFDL|migration=relicense}}? This would help wikipedia:de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Commons-Transfer a lot. yours Matt (talk) 18:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Could you link me to an example image? --DieBuche (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Example Thanks for the quick reply. Matt (talk) 12:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Were all images following that description uploaded before November 1, 2008, per w:Wikipedia:Image license migration? Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:License_Migration_Task_Force/Migration. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done --DieBuche (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I purged this site, but it does not work yet :/ I am currently working on wikipedia:de:Portal Diskussion:Hamburg/verwaiste Bilder which seems to be entirely GFDL from before 2007. Matt (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It works fine for me: fully automated example --Leyo 20:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Works, great! Maybe |Permission=Released under the [[GNU Free Documentation License]]. could also be replaced by |Permission= because it is redundant and English only. Matt (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Magog the Ogre/cleanup.js does this. --Leyo 14:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid doubling in edit summary[edit]

If a bot move is checked and the result is previewed, followed by navigating back, the edit summary often contains a doubling, e.g. This bot move has been checked This bot move has been checked. It would be nice to have this fixed. --Leyo 10:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I adapted the code as provided by de:Wikipedia:Technik: Skin/Werkstatt. --Leyo 08:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Script leaves one empty line on the top[edit]

The script leaves one empty line on the top of the page. Could someone please provide the necessary change in the code? --Leyo 15:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Leyo 08:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]