File talk:Royal Standard of the Kingdom of France (fictitious).svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Coat of arms[edit]

Two completely different arms in the history: Which one is the correct one?--Antemister (talk) 21:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok time to put some order to this mess!
The First Flag, As shown in FOTW.net website - was used by the Kingdom of France as a Royal Standard (and thus something that is the closest thing we have to a modern State Flag) from the end of the 16th century up until 1792.
The Second Flag, As shown in FOTW.net website - Was used First before the revolution as a Naval Ensign [1], And then in the second time during the time of the Bourbon Restoration as a National Flag.
And Last but not Least, the Third Flag, as shown in FOTW.net website - As a Naval Ensign in the period both before the revolution, and in the time of the restauration.
So now, this is what I managed to understand from the Flags Of The World website. And if any of you has any thing he didn't understood or misunderstood on the topic, please contact the guys in the website above, and Don't Kill the Messenger!!!. --Oren neu dag (talk) 21:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are severe differences between the FOTW image (the angels, the color of the crown...) and the image here. This should be explained--Antemister (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All the differences that you mentioned above have a very simple explanation: I simply used whatever resources that I had in wikicommons, to create a flag that resembles the original in the FOTW website. If you're unhappy about those differences and would like to make the flag more like the original... You're very welcome to contribute. --Oren neu dag (talk) 23:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I really liked what you did a few years back. The adult angels are a lot better than the two baby angels that look more like cupids than angels. I would really like you and others to keep the first one.--Iberville (talk) 07:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]