File talk:Glühwendel brennt durch.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Realistic?[edit]

Strange, this bulb is burning but it is not connected to any power supply... Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The light bulb was screwed into a socket, which was replaced with the lamp base using image processing." See "other versions" in File:Glühlampe explodiert.jpg. Jee 03:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add category[edit]

Whenever the play is over and this file is available for normal use, please add Category:Damaged lighting devices. The idea of chosing one image among 30 million to be “the best” is both risible and disgusting. -- Tuválkin 02:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Mormegil (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Date[edit]

It is indicated that this was the Picture of the Day for 17 August 2014. Should this be 2013? SabreWolfy (talk) 08:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be true, though; I think the template just isn't good at handling dates in the future. —SamB (talk) 16:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@SabreWolfy: Except now I've added support to {{Picture of the day}} for displaying different text when the picture hasn't been featured yet, including an actually different text for English —SamB (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interview with the creator about this photo (in german)[edit]

See: http://www.golem.de/news/wikimedia-commons-wie-eine-durchbrennende-gluehlampe-zum-kunstobjekt-wird-1404-105631.html --Slick (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additional translation (Polish)[edit]

Please add the following to the description:

{{pl|1=Po wykonaniu otworu w szkle żarówki ulotnił się [[:pl:w:Gaz szlachetny|gaz szlachetny]]. Po załączeniu zasilania [[:pl:w:żarnik|żarnik]] zaczyna płonąć ze względu na obecność tlenu pochodzącego z otoczenia. Podczas wykonania zdjęcia żarówka była wkręcona w oprawę lampy, którą zastąpiono gwintem żarówki w drodze fotomontażu.}}

 « Saper // @talk »  11:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Editprotected}}

✓ Done, thanks for helping out with translation! Best regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additional translation (Galician)[edit]

Please add the following to the description:

{{gl|1=Abriuse o cristal da lámpada causando que escapara o gas inerte do interior. Cando se acendeu, o filamento de tungsteno ardeu cunha chama debido ó osíxeno que entrara na lámpada. A lámpada estaba conectada a un casquillo, para darlle electricidade, que foi reemprazado pola base da lámpada mediante o procesado posterior da imaxe.}}

--Elisardojm (talk) 08:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC) {{Editprotected}}[reply]

✓ Done, thanks for helping out with translation! Best regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Licensing[edit]

  1. I've just edited the license by editing User:Ritchyblack/Template:Hinweis. Finding this to edit wasn't easy; the edit link was missing. Odd that this isn't protected by cascading. Is that a bug?
  2. What is "The version number and language version of the license are not binding for the following user or editor" supposed to mean? It's not English, as far as I can tell.
  3. It should be clearer that a reused has the option to use any of the three licenses, but an admin's editing privileges are needed to change that.--24.4.140.255 01:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Edit request}} Please add Category:Red backgrounds. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noncommercial license[edit]

Why is this image allowed to have a noncommercial creative commons license? I didn't think Commons would accept a noncommercial license. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is permitted as long as there's at least one non-restricted license. --Denniss (talk) 21:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]