File talk:Facebook like thumb.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This file was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2011 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on 6 February 2012 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2012 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Trademark violation
[edit]
Relevant discussion is at w:en:Template talk:Like#Trademark violation. -- Trevj (talk) 16:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- ...where I stated We'll see what uninvolved admins there make of it (my emphasis). Nothing personal, but per points raised by Matthiaspaul in the discussion there, I don't think this revert qualifies. Where do we go from here? -- Trevj (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- The copyvio tag was justified by nothing, a trademark registration (that may or may not hapen in the future) does not affect the copyright status. All file incarnations should now have the trademark warning template. --Denniss (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation. IMHO it was placed under the justification of COM:PRP. The tag indicated a perceived violation of copyright, rather than trademark, and there appears to be significant doubt about the freedom of this file, as raised recently by editors on en-wiki. -- Trevj (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Since when does commons care anything about what wikipedians think? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 14:59, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- Also noting previous VP discussion. -- Trevj (talk) 09:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since when does commons care anything about what wikipedians think? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 14:59, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation. IMHO it was placed under the justification of COM:PRP. The tag indicated a perceived violation of copyright, rather than trademark, and there appears to be significant doubt about the freedom of this file, as raised recently by editors on en-wiki. -- Trevj (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
