File talk:Chelonia mydas is going for the air edit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Would you please tell it to AngMoKio for me? Please notice that the nominated image has much higher resolution than current FP does, not to say that the composition is absolutely different.BTW, if between all the images of absolutely the same bees and the same birds and the same squirrels FP has no place for a second image of a green turtle, let's delist the current FP of green turtle (I'll be the first one to support it) because the nominated image is better. (I know, I took both of them) Thanks.--Mbz1 20:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, with this bird, it was my mistake, I didn´t read all informations. Please, see discussion here: [1].--Karelj 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Would you please tell it to AngMoKio for me? Please notice that the nominated image has much higher resolution than current FP does, not to say that the composition is absolutely different.BTW, if between all the images of absolutely the same bees and the same birds and the same squirrels FP has no place for a second image of a green turtle, let's delist the current FP of green turtle (I'll be the first one to support it) because the nominated image is better. (I know, I took both of them) Thanks.--Mbz1 20:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is an absolutely different situation than with that bird because of quite a few reasons. The most important are that the quality of the nominated image is better, the resolution is higher, the composition is different, and different type of behaviour is shown compare to the current FP. Besides I'm ready to delist the current FP of a green turtle to give a way to a new better image. That's why I cannot consider the reason of your oppose as a legitimate one.I consider it as a very, very unfair reason to oppose the image.Your oppose reason is also in the violation with Commons:Image guidelines--Mbz1 20:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- BTW you just supported (two nominations down) the image of the sameHoverfly. Seems kind of inconsistent, unfair and biased, doesn't it?--Mbz1 21:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hello you two. Don't you think we should move this discussion to the discussion page and think again about the exact FP criteria or maybe renew them. Don't you think it makes sense to declare FP as a collection of wow-pictures (whatever that means) no matter about the subject and how often it is represented in the FPs. I'd hate to see great pictures getting declined here because of that reason. And Mbz don't worry you can talk to me personally...i am a quite nice guy :) --AngMoKio 17:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
