File talk:Cc-nd white.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Replace with optimized[edit]

{{Editprotected}} Please replace with File:OptiCc-nd white.svg. Palosirkka (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per this discussion. Rd232 (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing[edit]

Shouldn't it be {{PD-shape}}? Clamira (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC) / 11:59 (CEST) {{editprotected}}[reply]

Definitely. Although, however, a = sign is not geometry, so it's probably rather {{PD-ineligible}}.    FDMS  4    17:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
U+229C ⊜ looks to me a candidate for {{PD-Unicode}}. sarang♥사랑 18:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Protected reduced to allow all users to edit the file description page -FASTILY 00:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid[edit]

{{InvalidSVG}} The (now) valid OptiCc-nd white.svg should replace this invalid Cc-nd white.svg:  with its odd user space template. Please copy {{validSVG}}, and maybe replace Category:Round symbols by Category:Encircled letters, numbers and symbols as used on most unprotected CC SVG logos with circles. –Be..anyone (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC) {{Editprotected}} Copied from the Cc-by_new_white.svg talk page:[reply]

Rillke's quote in a nutshell: "Valid"  beats "readable"

Just in case, I created OptiCc-nd white.svg with rsvg, SVG to SVG, from the invalid protected source, not from the invalid old scour-version, adding syntactic sugar (parameters) to the <svg>-element to satisfy the W3C-validator. This shouldn't be too bad, MediaWiki also uses rsvg. –Be..anyone (talk) 10:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a lot of work. All one had to do was 
-xmlns:sodipodi="http://inkscape.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"
+xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"
-- Rillke(q?) 09:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I had no idea that the current W3C validator actually tries to fetch DTDs, but admittedly their former DTD validator did that. –Be..anyone (talk) 10:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It says it doesn't resolve external entities but in the end it obviously does something like that. But I might be completely wrong here; don't deal that often with svg -- Rillke(q?) 11:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently fixed months ago, I've disabled the pointless {{InvalidSVG}}. –Be..anyone (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simple[edit]

3453 bytes for such a simple pic seems very much! It could be done easy with this coding 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="64" height="64">
<path fill="#FFF" stroke="#000" stroke-width="6"
d="M3,31a29,29 0 1,1 0,2zm17-4h24m0,11H20"/>
</svg>

without any garbage, like the transparent version Cc-nd.svg: . Of course it's valid. sarang♥사랑 08:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, whatever works and is valid, it passes as SVG basic 1.1 (not tiny):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1 Basic//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-basic.dtd">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="64" height="64" viewBox="0 0 64 64" baseProfile="basic" version="1.1">
 <path fill="#FFF" stroke="#000" stroke-width="6" d="M3,31a29,29 0 1,1 0,2zm17-4h24m0,11H20"/>
</svg>
The unrelated edit request for the license is over a year old, I'll add a technical=yes below for this disaster in upkeeping minimal quality standards. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Edit request}}  less bytes for a valid SVG aren't important. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Maybe Commons:Requested updates to protected images works better than {{Editprotected}}, I started some tests for protected redirected license templates; i.e., the redirection was protected, but had no category (for whatever it's good for.)

For the page here the log says: "2009-12-26T01:34:25 Ilmari Karonen (Talk | contribs) protected "File:Cc-nd white.svg"‎ [edit=sysop] (indefinite) (temporary edit protection until separate upload protection starts working again) (hist)"

Five years ago. The page (not necessarily the file, as far as ND is really critical) should be unprotected for new COM:MRD tricks.

And the old CC-BY 2.0 license for a PD-ineligible icon (see still pending 2014-10 edit request above) is bogus, the author copied what CC generally said eight years ago, and that turned out to be overkill later. It's annoying when forever "temporarily" protected files can't be fixed without admin help. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Cc-nd_white.svg&oldid=150198184"