File:Top 25 countries by total amount of article processing charges (APCs) expenditures 2015–2018 based on fractionalized publications.png
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 718 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 287 × 240 pixels | 575 × 480 pixels | 919 × 768 pixels | 1,226 × 1,024 pixels | 2,452 × 2,048 pixels | 2,800 × 2,339 pixels.
Original file (2,800 × 2,339 pixels, file size: 393 KB, MIME type: image/png)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionTop 25 countries by total amount of article processing charges (APCs) expenditures 2015–2018 based on fractionalized publications.png |
English: "Figure 5 displays the total fractionalized expenditures per country for the 25 countries with the largest amounts of APCs. According to our estimates, the United States ($184.7 million), China ($148.0 million) and the United Kingdom ($134.6 million) are responsible for paying the largest amounts of OA fees to the publishers. Some countries pay a larger share of hybrid APCs than expected. For example, Poland (82.9% of APCs, 71.5% of OA articles hybrid), Austria (76.1%, 66.2%), the Netherlands (75.4%, 65.8%), and the United Kingdom (73.4%, 63.8%) followed by Sweden (62.2%, 51.1%), Brazil (53.4%, 38.4%), Norway (52.7%, 40.6%), and Finland (52.2%, 40.3%) pay more APCs for hybrid than for gold publications. For comparison, the expected rates for the entire data set would be 42.3% of APCs and 30.5% of OA publications to be hybrid. On the other end of the spectrum, among the top 25 countries shown in Figure 5, Taiwan (85.8% of APCs, 91.7% of OA articles gold), South Korea (85.0%, 90.0%), and China (83.7%, 88.2%) pay and publish more gold OA articles than expected."
The study was featured in 2023 in science |
Date | |
Source | https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/4/4/778/118070/The-oligopoly-s-shift-to-open-access-How-the-big |
Author |
Authors of the study: Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc-André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, Stefanie Haustein |
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:24, 4 March 2024 | 2,800 × 2,339 (393 KB) | Prototyperspective (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc-André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, Stefanie Haustein from https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/4/4/778/118070/The-oligopoly-s-shift-to-open-access-How-the-big with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 37.79 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 37.79 dpc |