File:The photographic history of the Civil War - thousands of scenes photographed 1861-65, with text by many special authorities (1911) (14762746925).jpg

Identifier: photographichist01mill (find matches)
Title: The photographic history of the Civil War : thousands of scenes photographed 1861-65, with text by many special authorities
Year: 1911 (1910s)
Authors: Miller, Francis Trevelyan, 1877-1959 Lanier, Robert S. (Robert Sampson), 1880-
Subjects: United States -- History Civil War, 1861-1865 Pictorial works United States -- History Civil War, 1861-1865
Publisher: New York : Review of Reviews Co.
Contributing Library: New York Public Library
Digitizing Sponsor: MSN

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
lief fromcommand because of his disapproval. It caused Burnsidesarmy to be absent from the battle of Chickamauga. In 1864, the campaigns of Price in ^Missouri and Hoodin Tennessee are said to have been intended to affect the presi-dential election at the North by giving encouragement to thejiarty which was claiming that the war was a Federal failure.If that was not the case might not Hood have done better bjmarching in the track of Longstreet through Knoxville,Tennessee, and Lynchburg, Virginia, to join I^ee, while Sher-man was marching to the sea, entirely out of reach? An unreasonable importance, from a military point ofview, was given to the capital of each government. The cap-ital of the United States had been captuied in two warswithout producing more than local effect, but every plan in (lis) Jk^^^^Sssar « ^ 1 % JX ^ ■^■■iS*-^ OT osco 9-CO o c r= ■^ ^ F! ^ S-, a ^ > H 8 2 & f D. nP f^ o d j:: o ■M b. ^ = u
Text Appearing After Image:
£ a s. = ^ =s — = -^ -^ d 6^- - - J= H 8 sa 2 u««-■ .^ u O O ^ ^ c ^ .-5 H ni ^ n +J +J t^ 3 T? ^ a •S a a — o c= & .S rS — S -^ M o ^ ^ ■5 Q Q. O o ^ — ~ £ •§ I S ^ ;■« -^ 5 I -= o i a ^. g -I & c J2 O o ■ f := c eq — be -ti -o _ CC ^ °3 -t; ^ -r o to ^-g I K S ^ -c ■^ 2 -g 1 ii a o p^ ^ S =« a fc o .o -^ ^ 72 ed O ^ tratniiu nf 18fil-B5 -^ 4- -^ 4- •*• Pi ^ ^irginia was contingent upon the safety of Wasliington. thuscausinsr the diversion of liianv thousand soldiers for tliat singleduty. On the Soutliern side the correct military decisionwould have been to abandon Richmond as soon as Peters-burg was invested, but the Government delayed, for politicalreasons, until it was too late, and the defending army surren-dered as a consequence. In the distribution of troops the Federal authorities werehampered by the rival claims of the border States, whichthought they required jirotection. Hence, Ohio sent an armyint

Note About Images