File:Overall level of empirical support for six major hypotheses in invasion biology.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 584 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 234 × 240 pixels | 468 × 480 pixels | 748 × 768 pixels | 1,151 × 1,181 pixels.
Original file (1,151 × 1,181 pixels, file size: 1.11 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Overall level of empirical support for six major hypotheses in invasion biology
|
This graph image could be re-created using vector graphics as an SVG file. This has several advantages; see Commons:Media for cleanup for more information. If an SVG form of this image is available, please upload it and afterwards replace this template with
{{vector version available|new image name}}.
It is recommended to name the SVG file “Overall level of empirical support for six major hypotheses in invasion biology.svg”—then the template Vector version available (or Vva) does not need the new image name parameter. |
 | This graph image was uploaded in the JPEG format even though it consists of non-photographic data. This information could be stored more efficiently or accurately in the PNG or SVG format. If possible, please upload a PNG or SVG version of this image without compression artifacts, derived from a non-JPEG source (or with existing artifacts removed). After doing so, please tag the JPEG version with {{Superseded|NewImage.ext}} and remove this tag. This tag should not be applied to photographs or scans. If this image is a diagram or other image suitable for vectorisation, please tag this image with {{Convert to SVG}} instead of {{BadJPEG}}. If not suitable for vectorisation, use {{Convert to PNG}}. For more information, see {{BadJPEG}}. |  |
Summary[edit]
| Description |
English: EOverall level of empirical support for six of invasion biology’s major hypotheses. Hypotheses focusing on ecosystems where invaders were introduced are on the left (biotic resistance, island susceptibility), the tens rule which focuses on the invaders themselves is on the right, and hypotheses considering invader-ecosystem interactions are in between (invasional meltdown, novel weapons, enemy release). |
| Date | |
| Source | Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012). "Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining". Neobiota. 14: 1–20. doi:10.3897/NEOBIOTA.14.3435. |
| Author | Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012) |
Licensing[edit]
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 18:57, 20 April 2023 | | 1,151 × 1,181 (1.11 MB) | Daniel Mietchen (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012) from Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012). "Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining". Neobiota. 14: 1–20. doi:10.3897/NEOBIOTA.14.3435. with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
- File:Example of a hierarchy of hypotheses - Oo 9019.jpg (file redirect)
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
