File:IF SCIENCE WAS GLOBALLY APPLIED, CURRENT ENERGIES AND DEPURATIONS DO NOT HAVE A FUTURE.jpg

English: IF SCIENCE WAS BEEN GLOBALLY APPLIED, CURRENT ENERGIES AND DEPURATIONS WOULD NOT HAVE A FUTURE

(Fourth Letter to the International Courts of Justice) Abstract I think that at the point where it is useless to run politicians, entrepreneurs, economists, authorities of the environment and energy. The only ones who can claim the scientific truth are the International Judges, appointing special commissions. But, certainly, the commissions have an economic cost. I do not know if Judges have a sufficient budget for such inquiries. I do not even know if they can, investigate on the basis of simple open letters and documents published by the undersigned. For the moment even the International Judges are silent. One thing is certain, since the advent of the industrial age, environmental science has never been applied globally, both when making depuration, both when producing energy, both when performing other human activities. In tutti i settori si lavora a compartimenti stagni senza creare collegamenti e sinergie con l’ambiente circostante. In all sectors, you work in watertight compartments without creating connections and synergies with the surrounding environment. The undersigned who has proposed to the world the chimneys recovering heat and CO2, the water and air sewage gutters, the limestone greenhouses that would produce oxidized and alkaline waters by cold consumption of CO2 in the same urban centers, is considered a person who can not lose it sportily, if the world's most democratically-constituted world of science and technology does not consider its solutions. It does not matter if at least 99% of that majority can not freely express their opinion, being constrained by corporate loyalty, rightly so, claim public and private employers. In other words in terms of environment and energy, only delegated directors have decision-making powers. All others do not count, they simply keep the company positions in the best interests of the company they belong to. The end justifies the means. The end is business survival, the means of defense is silence. Therefore, even CEOs respond to those shows, with new solutions, which since the advent of the industrial age have been made poor choices on energy and environmental terms. New solutions must be demonstrated. Who can show them if everyone keeps silence?

The highly detailed scientific information on pollution issues and alarms from environmental associations, writers and opposition politicians, including former vice president Al Gore, awarded with the 2007 Nobel Prize for my undersigned, Contrary to what they want, because they make more funds available for the environment and research, but investments and research do not change the direction in which previous investments took place. Consequently, if technical and scientific mistakes were made in the initial setting of global purification and energy development, no one can perceive it. More investments are made in areas that have already given their full potential without getting great results, the more they subtract resources to alternative solutions that have never been developed, which are more likely to succeed. Obviously, I am talking about my solutions to fossil energy cleanup, as mentioned above, democratically ignored by public executives who follow the laws of politics and the private ones that follow the laws of the market. The limits of current public and private delegated directors are immense because public ones have a wrong environmental model and private ones, an industrial development model partially wrong, as it is not correct by public environmental directives. Just think about the automotive industry, which is the most up-to-date and efficient in the world, which has failed to focus on the thermal engine. The same was done by the aeronautical and naval industry. The limits of current world CEOs are due to the limits imposed by scientific and technological research to defend the scientific and technological choices made previously, on which the current world economy is obviously based. How can current global, public and private delegated directors recognize the value of interactive water-to-air energy that, without fuels, avoids CO2 emissions and even oxidizes the waters, which can be produced at all times of the day and of the night, with any terrestrial temperature, and which you can also be fitted on the means of transport? Where did this energy come from, if none of them financed it? Who has betrayed the orders received? World CEOs are quiet. Nobody betrayed them but they were unable to prevent solutions that they have discarded on fossil energy clean-up, and make other ideas on low-cost water and air recycling, which have led to the interactive energy between water and Air that does not emit CO2 and thin dust, consuming only material wear, can be at least 2.5 times more powerful than fossil, simply using better physics and current technologies.

English: the description is shown on the figure