File:Example of a hierarchy of hypotheses.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 387 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 155 pixels | 640 × 310 pixels | 1,512 × 732 pixels.
Original file (1,512 × 732 pixels, file size: 123 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Example of a hierarchy of hypotheses
|
This diagram image could be re-created using vector graphics as an SVG file. This has several advantages; see Commons:Media for cleanup for more information. If an SVG form of this image is available, please upload it and afterwards replace this template with
{{vector version available|new image name}}.
It is recommended to name the SVG file “Example of a hierarchy of hypotheses.svg”—then the template Vector version available (or Vva) does not need the new image name parameter. |
 | This diagram image was uploaded in the JPEG format even though it consists of non-photographic data. This information could be stored more efficiently or accurately in the PNG or SVG format. If possible, please upload a PNG or SVG version of this image without compression artifacts, derived from a non-JPEG source (or with existing artifacts removed). After doing so, please tag the JPEG version with {{Superseded|NewImage.ext}} and remove this tag. This tag should not be applied to photographs or scans. If this image is a diagram or other image suitable for vectorisation, please tag this image with {{Convert to SVG}} instead of {{BadJPEG}}. If not suitable for vectorisation, use {{Convert to PNG}}. For more information, see {{BadJPEG}}. |  |
Summary[edit]
| Description |
English: Example of a hierarchy of hypotheses. The biotic resistance hypothesis (as defined in the main body text) can be divided into sub-hypotheses according to the different measures (and thus definitions) of native biodiversity and resistance against invaders. Note that all measures of resistance typically applied are inverse measurements: the quantity measured reflects the susceptibility of ecosystems against invaders, so its inverse reflects resistance against invaders. Each of the five sub-hypotheses corresponding to different measures of biodiversity branch into five sub-sub-hypotheses corresponding to different measures of resistance against invaders. For illustrative purposes, the second branching is only shown for one sub-hypothesis (species richness as a measure of biodiversity). |
| Date | |
| Source | Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012). "Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining". Neobiota. 14: 1–20. doi:10.3897/NEOBIOTA.14.3435. |
| Author | Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012) |
Licensing[edit]
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 18:57, 20 April 2023 | | 1,512 × 732 (123 KB) | Daniel Mietchen (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012) from Jonathan Jeschke; Lorena Gómez Aparicio; Sylvia Haider; Tina Heger; Christopher Lortie; Petr Pyšek; David Strayer (2012). "Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining". Neobiota. 14: 1–20. doi:10.3897/NEOBIOTA.14.3435. with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
