File:Cyclic preferences after Schumm 1987.gif

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cyclic_preferences_after_Schumm_1987.gif(793 × 285 pixels, file size: 5 KB, MIME type: image/gif)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Color illustration of Schumm's example[1] of cyclic preferences.

The example assumes that more red colors[note 1] are preferred[note 2] over more blue colors,[note 3] but 9 and 5 are indistiguishable for the human eye,[note 4][note 5] as are 5 and 1. Furthermore it assumes that a triple (a,b,c) is preferred[note 6] over a triple (p,q,r) e.g. if a>p and b~q and c~r.[note 7]

But this implies the following paradoxical preference cycle: (9,5,1) > (1,9,5) > (5,1,9) > (9,5,1).

This cycle is illustrated in the picture, with each triple depicted as a column.

  • The leftmost column is preferred over the 2nd from left since its top color is clearly more red, while their middle and their bottom colors are indistinguishable.
  • Similarly, the 2nd column from left is preferred over the 2nd from right since its middle color is more red while top and bottom colors are indistinguishable.
  • And the 2nd column from right is preferred over the rightmost column since its bottom color is more red, while top and middle colors are indistinguishable.

However, the leftmost column is identical to rhe rightmost one, so the preferences form a cycle.

Notes:

  1. annotated by higher numbers
  2. indicated by ">"
  3. annotated by lower numbers; think of a number as indicating the degree of redness
  4. indicated by "~"
  5. color differences are overdone to illustrate the argument; think of a "redness difference" of 6 as the least perceptible one
  6. also indicated by ">"
  7. according to Voorhoeve and Binmore,[2] p.107-108, there is evidence that people extend component preferences to tuples in this way.

References:

  1. George F. Schumm (Nov 1987). "Transitivity, Preference and Indifference". Philosophical Studies 52: 435–437.
  2. Alex Voorhoeve and Ken Binmore (Jan 2006). "Transitivity, the Sorites Paradox, and Similarity-Based Decision-Making". Erkenntnis 64: 101–114.
Date
Source Own work
Author Jochen Burghardt

Licensing[edit]

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:02, 4 January 2019Thumbnail for version as of 20:02, 4 January 2019793 × 285 (5 KB)Jochen Burghardt (talk | contribs)User created page with UploadWizard

There are no pages that use this file.