File:Annals of surgery (1885) (14783472265).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(2,800 × 1,666 pixels, file size: 1.29 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]



Description
English:

Identifier: annalsofsurgery44philuoft (find matches)
Title: Annals of surgery
Year: 1885 (1880s)
Authors:
Subjects: Surgery
Publisher: Philadelphia Lippincott
Contributing Library: Gerstein - University of Toronto
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Toronto

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
m to be statements offacts so vitally patent as to demand no further discussion, yetthat imperatively indicate restitutional rather than destructivesurgical measures. Of these various restitutional measures,we are, in this discussion, concerned with but the last,—ureteralanastomosis. IV. Methods.—Consideration of the methods scheduledin Section I. will show that the general plan of procedure doesnot vary in any vitally essential detail. In Groups I. and II. apposition of extremities is direct,transverse or oblique, with or without support. Group III. Apposition of extremities is by direct invagi-nation, with or without splitting of segment, with or withoutsupport. Group IV. Apposition of the extremities by lateral inva-gination, without support. In Groups I. and II. Outer, middle and inner coats comeinto direct contact with their several fellows of the other seg-ment. In Groups III. and IV. The middle coats do not apposeeach other, but contact is permitted between the outer sheath
Text Appearing After Image:
TRANS-URETERO-URETERAL-ANASTOMOSIS. 697 of the male segment and the inner coat of the female, save whenthe outer sheath of the male segment has perchance been lib-erally scarified,—it then may be assumed that the muscularis ofthe male segment would be brought in apposition with theintima of the female. A modified Joberts invagination sutureseems to have been most commonly employed. V. Personal Work.—It may be readily conceived that alateral spinal deflection would so seriously alter ordinary ana-tomic relations that any one of these excellent methods wouldprove technically difficult, if not actually impossible.* Andagain so large a section of the ureter may be lost, whether asa result of pathologic involvement or surgical intervention, thathere also a similar difficulty, or impossibility, would be con-fronted. With these matters under consideration, and insearch of a method that might prove efficacious, in 1900 wasdevised and performed on two dogs the lateral invagmation ofthe pro

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/14783472265/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)
At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Volume
InfoField
44
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:annalsofsurgery44philuoft
  • bookyear:1885
  • bookdecade:1880
  • bookcentury:1800
  • booksubject:Surgery
  • bookpublisher:Philadelphia_Lippincott
  • bookcontributor:Gerstein___University_of_Toronto
  • booksponsor:University_of_Toronto
  • bookleafnumber:801
  • bookcollection:gerstein
  • bookcollection:toronto
  • bookcollection:medicalheritagelibrary
  • bookcollection:university_of_toronto
Flickr posted date
InfoField
30 July 2014

Licensing

[edit]
This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.


Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/14783472265. It was reviewed on 6 August 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

6 August 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current04:01, 20 November 2015Thumbnail for version as of 04:01, 20 November 20152,800 × 1,666 (1.29 MB)SteinsplitterBot (talk | contribs)Bot: Image rotated by 90°
19:08, 6 August 2015Thumbnail for version as of 19:08, 6 August 20151,666 × 2,806 (1.24 MB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{subst:chc}} {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Identifier''': annalsofsurgery44philuoft ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insource%3A%2Fannalsofsurg...

There are no pages that use this file.