File:A diversity of automatic recorders to monitor ecological communities non-invasively and remotely - Ele14123-fig-0002-m.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(2,128 × 946 pixels, file size: 535 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

A diversity of automatic recorders to monitor ecological communities non-invasively and remotely

Summary[edit]

Description
English: A diversity of automatic recorders to monitor ecological communities non-invasively and remotely. (1) Vocalising birds being monitored by microphones deployed on trees. (2) Stridulating and drumming fishes being recorded by hydrophones attached to moorings. (3) Walking elephants producing ground vibrations perceived by geophones. (4) Fish shoal being detected by a sonar. (5) Oceanic glider navigating an Environmental Sampling Processor (ESP) to sample eDNA. (6) Bear being detected by camera traps fixed on trees. (7) Hyperspectral camera mounted on a drone and monitoring tree composition in a forest. (8) LiDAR sensor mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle monitoring multiple forest canopies. (9) Imaging flow cytometer attached to a mooring and recording planktonic communities. (10) Racoons being detected by thermal and IR cameras at night. (11) Stationary radar and a satellite radar, respectively, monitoring bird and large mammal populations. Recorder's ability to detect the presence of living organisms, count their numbers, classify them at the species level and measure their traits (e.g. behavioural, functional and morphological traits) is evaluated from 1 to 3 levels as follows: 1 bar corresponds to ‘in corner-case situations only’, 2 bars corresponds to ‘in specific conditions and on specific organisms (for detecting, counting and classifying) or for a limited number of features (for measuring)’, and 3 bars corresponds to ‘in most cases and for most organisms (for detecting, counting and classifying) and for several features (for measuring)’.
Date
Source Marc Besson, Jamie Alison, Kim Bjerge, Thomas E. Gorochowski, Toke T. Høye, Tommaso Jucker, Hjalte M. R. Mann, Christopher F. Clements (2022) Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities. Ecology Letters, 25, 2753– 2775. doi:10.1111/ele.14123
Author Marc Besson, Jamie Alison, Kim Bjerge, Thomas E. Gorochowski, Toke T. Høye, Tommaso Jucker, Hjalte M. R. Mann, Christopher F. Clements

Licensing[edit]

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current09:09, 10 April 2023Thumbnail for version as of 09:09, 10 April 20232,128 × 946 (535 KB)Daniel Mietchen (talk | contribs)Uploaded a work by Marc Besson, Jamie Alison, Kim Bjerge, Thomas E. Gorochowski, Toke T. Høye, Tommaso Jucker, Hjalte M. R. Mann, Christopher F. Clements from Marc Besson, Jamie Alison, Kim Bjerge, Thomas E. Gorochowski, Toke T. Høye, Tommaso Jucker, Hjalte M. R. Mann, Christopher F. Clements (2022) Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities. Ecology Letters, 25, 2753– 2775. doi:10.1111/ele.14123 with UploadWizard

The following page uses this file:

File usage on other wikis