Commons:Valued image candidates/Zwanenbloem (Butomus umbellatus) 04.jpg

Zwanenbloem (Butomus umbellatus) 04.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Famberhorst (talk) on 2017-08-21 04:41 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush), budding umbel.
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment The scope is overly complicated: Of course it's a close-up, how else would you create a useful image of flower buds?. The "beautiful" is something that typically does not belong in a VIC scope at all. On the other hand, it's missing the English name in parantheses. Propose to use the following instead: Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush), flower buds. --El Grafo (talk) 09:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Sorry, mild  Oppose because I think File:Суса́к зо́нтичный ( Bútomus umbellátus).JPG is most useful in this category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Counter- Support too keep this open for discussion: @Ikan Kekek: what I like about this one is that it shows the complete en:Inflorescence. What if we changed the scope one more and replaced "flower buds" by "immature inflorescence"? --El Grafo (talk) 06:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment - I really don't see any substantial difference. Maybe this photo is just slightly further on in the process, but not so that the difference is marked. I really don't see differentiating the scopes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC) What I was trying to say: Your counter-proposal shows a bunch of buds, and might indeed be better suited for such a scope. This one shows the whole inflorescence (= arrangement of flowers/flower buds) and is thus suitable to illustrate that it is organized in an en:Umbel. That seems to be an important feature of this species, as it made its way into the scientific name (B. umbellatus). --El Grafo (talk) 07:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC) OK, I'm understanding now. But then what scope are you proposing? "Butomus umbellatus flower buds in an umbel"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC) "to bud" can also be used as a verb, so why not simply "Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush), budding umbel"? --El Grafo (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC) That makes sense. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Famberhorst, would you like to make the scope change El Grafo suggests? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)  Done. Corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC) There's a procedure for changing the scope, but anyway,  Support in the new scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)