Sorry, but I should object against this nomination as well as the other three ones that are nominated at the same time. Let me rephrase the so popular line from the scope guidelines: Not any writer is worth a Valued Image scope. If some writer is eminent enough so that, in the future, to be placed in a list like this: Famous writers and poets from Ukraine - then he deserves its own scope. I've been working on these four nominations research for a week and as for the present moment I don't think that they reached notability for their own scopes. So I Oppose. Note that I don't eliminate the probability some of them to have potential to develop durable significance for the Ukrainian literature but for now they are just writers as thousands like them in the world.--MrPanyGoff19:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that in most of the countries in the world at least one novel is published every week. Can you calculate the numbers of the published works just for the last decade? The quantity of the written novels is not a feature of notability. Can you imagine images of all these writers to be nominated for VI? There won't be room enough for authors like Pushkin and Hemingway in the galleries. Once again, I don't mean that he is a bad writer. I'm sure that there are eminent Ukrainian authors, our contemporaries (still alive or recently deceased), that are suitable for VI. Let's find photos of them.--MrPanyGoff22:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support We are not here to judge the literary value or level of popularity of those we presented. They are a public figure and as such it can be included here. The question boils down to: This photograph is the best? For me yes. When the number of images, this is not a good argument. We are currently capturing more than 100,000 species ammonite, several million species living or extinct, this should fill us with enthusiasm. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this review. I've been waiting for officially expressed opinion, with these exactly statements, for months. Now I'm completely satisfied more so the statement was by the so reputable and highly awarded user. Moreover, I think we can use this review as a reference (even criterion) to clarify similar cases in the future. This is a chance to reduce the subjectivity and the unequal treatment. Now I withdraw my opposition in the name of the clear and equal evaluation for all of the nominated images. I'm not going to insist retribution for all the photographs that was unfairly dismissed because of the lack of this exact statement. I hope that their authors (or nominators) will restore their killed enthusiasm. I hope that you are going to stand behind this statement and will give your support not only for the superstars of Wiki Commons when such cases arise. By the way at the same time in the neighboring box in the candidates list some discussion, contrary to your words, is underway ;)--MrPanyGoff23:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you for these wise words and pleasant. I try to pay attention to problems that may exist but does not hesitate to ask me if you found it useful. A Ukrainian, Bulgarian and French in a common task. Life is beautiful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
