Commons:Valued image candidates/The sun ring.jpg

Image:The sun ring.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	Mrmariokartguy (talk) on 2008-09-22 01:31 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Sun; 22 degree-Solar Halo
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Oppose Tells nothing about the Sun except that it is bright when seen from the Earth. --Eusebius (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC) There's the halo thing. Mrmariokartguy (talk) 14:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Then maybe "solar halo" would be a better scope, but then the picture would be in competition with many good ones like this one or this one. --Eusebius (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC) I added 22 degree-Halo to the scope. Mrmariokartguy (talk) 02:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)  Info When changing scopes, please use the {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}} template. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Would you be ok with "22° solar halo" instead? --Eusebius (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Scope changed from Sun to Sun, 22 degree-Solar halo --Mrmariokartguy (talk) 12:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Oppose Redundant info in the scope, I still don't like it. Anyway, I still think this one and this one are better. --Eusebius (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC) It's not easy to take a picture of the sun midday.Mrmariokartguy (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC) I've never said so! Reviews are not about judging photographers, they're about deciding whether one picture is the most suitable or not, given a set of criteria. --Eusebius (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Wait, which VI criteria does it not meet? Mrmariokartguy (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC) According to me, the first one (being the most valuable within the scope). Plus, I'm still not at ease with the scope (crit. 2). --Eusebius (talk) 04:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Result: 1 oppose => Declined. -- Slaunger (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)