Commons:Valued image candidates/Sortland - no-nb digifoto 20160714 00014 NB MIT FNR 17607.jpg

Sortland - no-nb digifoto 20160714 00014 NB MIT FNR 17607.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Blue Elf (talk) on 2016-08-09 09:48 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Sortland - Strand ferry connection 1957
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment it would be useful to add the year of the taking of the photograph on the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)  Support The scope is well defined according to Commons:VISC, no need for year in it. Useful image.--Grtek (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)  Oppose For a historical value image request to the date in the scope is not unreasonable. Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment Define where starts "historical" value and where ends any other kind of value. Second ago? Year ago? Decade ago? And again, please propose it to rules. In the moment there isnt anything anywhere written about that black and white images are valuable just because historical value and that images with historical value must have year in scope (and not just in description). --Grtek (talk) 11:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Oppose Per Archaeodontosaurus. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment We live in a world in 4 dimensions. For the first 3 we geocoding. If today I go to this place it is very probable that I will see things very different. I would be right in saying that this image mischaracterized the scope. This point is provided in the rules. Yet this difference is very interesting and the image must have a label VI. The only thing is to put 1957 in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment I have added the year to the scope now. Blue Elf (talk) 11:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)