Comment - About the scope: "Tresor" is not an English word. Should we use an English word to describe this? What is this box intended to store? Treasures in fact? If so, should we call it a safe? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The scope should be more exactly, it should contain the name of this specific object. Without knowledge od french i can not help, perhaps @Archaeodontosaurus: can? --Berthold Werner (talk)
I agree. The scope should specify what the reliquary contains (whose remains, and if needed for disambiguation, what particular remains) as well as the church it's in. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are indeed some inaccuracies in this appointment. It is not a "reliquary arm" nor in any way an element of reliquary. It is indeed a part of the treasure of the Church of St Nectaire but these are Bookbindings twelfth century. The caption and scope should be changed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry, I should have remembered the books with bejeweled covers. Well, in that case, we can say this is useful and Support, can't we? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
