Commons:Valued image candidates/RubyThroatedHummingbird.jpg

RubyThroatedHummingbird.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	JMSchneid (talk) on 2009-05-01 21:47 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Archilochus colubris (Ruby-Throated Hummingbird), female
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment For a VI, I think a tighter crop would be more valuable. Also, I'd suggest limiting the scope to the female here, with a picture like this one for the male scope. --Eusebius (talk) 10:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Scope changed from Archilochus colubris (Ruby-Throated Hummingbird) to Archilochus colubris (Ruby-Throated Hummingbird) Female --JMSchneid (talk) 17:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Comment OK for the scope. I still think a crop would be better for a VI. --Eusebius (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)  Comment OK, I changed the image to a new cropped version --JMSchneid (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)  Support OK for me. I took the liberty to actually change the picture in the candidature page. --Eusebius (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC) MVR Scores: 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/RubyThroatedHummingbird.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Female Ruby-throated Hummingbird.jpg: +2 => File:RubyThroatedHummingbird.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Female Ruby-throated Hummingbird.jpg: Promoted. --VT98Fan (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment I'm not sure what happened with this MVR. Apparently the opponent who became VI was un-VI'd because the description was not accurate. This probably belongs as a new nomination for a single image VI. If anyone disagrees please revert the move.-Godot13 (talk) 05:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC) ::Of course, I can't figure out how to move this...-Godot13 (talk) 05:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Let's promote it for the time being, in order to give it back its VI seal. --Myrabella (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)