Commons:Valued image candidates/Rathaus St. Pölten.jpg

Rathaus St. Pölten.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	AleXXw •talk!•me@de.wp on 2010-09-18 17:39 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St. Pölten Town hall (St. Pöltner Rathaus)
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Question Although this is a huge file, don't you think that this one is much better as a representative photo of this building?--MrPanyGoff (talk) 07:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC) On the other one is a building site in the picture (the STRABAG-sign), in my opinion this shows the town hall better. --AleXXw •talk!•me@de.wp 23:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)  Comment Firstly, I would like to know if the community here likes this scope. If you are positive I'm thinking about opening a "Most Valued Review".--MrPanyGoff (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC) "the community" hasn't spoken yet... The town hall of a state capital should be acceptable. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Yes, there have been previous cases (see Commons:Valued images by topic#Institutional). More innovative is the way to format the scope. I find it interesting, referring to the last remark of that former inconclusive discussion about toponymy. --Myrabella (talk) 23:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)  Oppose Tight crop, tilted, dark grayish colours. Moreover, there are distracting people in the foreground that are cut in some confusing way.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 10:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC) MVR Scores: 1. Rathaus St. Pölten.jpg: -1 <-- 2. St. Poelten Rathaus 2.jpg: +2 => File:Rathaus St. Pölten.jpg: Declined. <-- File:St. Poelten Rathaus 2.jpg: Promoted. --Myrabella (talk) 21:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)