Commons:Valued image candidates/Raageshwari 5.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Raageshwari 5.jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} on 2013-01-31 05:58 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raageshwari
Used in Global usage
Reason Possibly best in scope. -- §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C}
Review
(criteria)
  • Note: Although the image is taken outdoors, it is just like any studio image. Hence i feel that geo-coding is not necessary. There are way to many good images in this category, many taken by professional photographers and released by the subject herself to Commons. I chose this one as it is a good calm image. Other suggestions are also welcome. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do we need geo coding for such studio photographs? This will look good in infoboxes when cropped. Isnt it? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I am not sure there a consensus about that. Finally I decided to support this one. Seeing the style of the picture, it is probably a staging, so the location is not really important. Yann (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 16:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Raageshwari 5 (cropped).jpg: +3
2. Raageshwari 5.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Raageshwari 5 (cropped).jpg: Promoted.
File:Raageshwari 5.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]