Almost there. I'd be more than happy to support, but criterion 6 requires categorization, and not simply the adding of the image to a gallery page. --MichaelMaggs16:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with nominator on the categorization issue. It is actually recommended that species are put in species galleries instead of species categories. This exception is also mentioned in the description of criterion 6. I hope the nominator will reconsider the withdrawal. -- Slaunger22:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support To my way of thinking, this image is a good example of a Valued Image of an animal. The only other images of this genus on Commons are of adults, Image:PseudosphinxDiscistriga.png and Image:Pseudosphinx tetrio sjh.JPG. The image quality and resolution are high. I should like to see a categorization exception for biota added explicitly to criterion 6 to forestall such objections (as above) in the future. I agree that geocoding is not relevant for this image.Walter Siegmund(talk)14:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it might be a good idea to mention the COM:TOL special case explicitly in the criterion to avoid further misunderstandings of this kind in the future.
