Commons:Valued image candidates/Pseudocalotes floweri, Flower’s long-headed lizard - Khao Khitchakut National Park (47144396302) by Rushen.jpg

Pseudocalotes floweri, Flower’s long-headed lizard - Khao Khitchakut National Park (47144396302) by Rushen.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	pandakekok9 on 2020-04-04 04:21 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Pseudocalotes floweri (Flower’s long-headed lizard)
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Question - File:Pseudocalotes floweri, Flower’s long-headed lizard - Khao Khitchakut National Park (47196103351) by Rushen.jpg shows all of the tail, though the animal takes up less of the image, so I'm not sure which photo is more useful. How do you compare the two photos? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC) I did compare to that photo first before nominating. The other photo has a branch cutting off the tail. It's true though that this photo doesn't show the whole tail (which is unfortunate). I think this one is more valuable because it shows the mouth open, and the animal takes up more of the image. I won't mind if someone challenge this nomination with an MVR though. pandakekok9 05:40, 5 April 2020 (UTC)  Support. I accept your argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)  Oppose the other with the tail is better for VI. Charles (talk) 12:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Please open an MVR then. pandakekok9 12:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC) That's not how the process works. MVR is used to replace existing VI. Charles (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC) No, it can also be used to challenge a nomination, which was done recently if you look at the MVR candidate list. pandakekok9 04:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)  Oppose Per tail. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 2 oppose => declined. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)