Commons:Valued image candidates/Protester Piano Extremist plays on the roof burned "Berkut" bus. The barricade across Hrushevskoho str. Kiev, 10.02.2014..jpg

Protester Piano Extremist plays on the roof burned "Berkut" bus. The barricade across Hrushevskoho str. Kiev, 10.02.2014..jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Ввласенко (talk) on 2020-03-26 20:01 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Protester Piano Extremist plays on the roof of a burned-out Berkut bus, the barricade across Hrushevskoho str., Kiev, 10 February 2014
Used in	Global usage Euromaidan, Євромайдан, Ukrajina, Евромайдан, Piano Extremist and etc.
Reason	Info Protester Piano Extremist plays on the roof of a burned-out Berkut bus, the barricade across Hrushevskoho str., Kiev, 10 February 2014. -- Ввласенко (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment - I made a slight correction, but are you saying the burned-out Berkut bus constituted the barricade? Please clarify for me and anyone else who's generally aware of the Euromaidan protests but unaware of these kinds of specifics. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Answer - Thank you for correction. Berkut blocked the Grushevsky st., using two buses. In the clashes with Protestants, buses were burned-out, and its skeletons, which blocked the street, were used to create a barricade. The barricade many times passed from hand to hand, and in one of the calm periods a piano was seted on the top of it. At the time of photo shot, Piano Extremist Bogdan played Chopin. -- Ввласенко (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC) I understand. And these were protestors. I assume most were not Protestants, though I know there are some Evangelicals in Ukraine. I will make other slight alterations to the scope. I'm  Supporting this nomination as useful historical documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Thank you. The word "protestants" appeared instead of "protesters" because of my mistake, religion does not appear in this case. -- Ввласенко (talk) 06:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Hold it: I mistook the "Info" in "reason" for the scope. The scope was way too broad. Would you accept this as the scope? Otherwise, I would have to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC) Yes I agree. -- Ввласенко (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)