Commons:Valued image candidates/Porte cigarette en ambre Dragon des Mines de Kaliningrad (1970).jpg

Porte cigarette en ambre Dragon des Mines de Kaliningrad (1970).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Pierre André (talk) on 2021-01-31 22:58 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Kaliningrad Amber Museum Amber cigarette holder "Dragon" (1970) , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment The Wikipedia articles about this church in English and French don't mention the amber. Where are these objects kept? Are they displayed in the Sacristy, perhaps? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC) * @Ikan Kekek: Wikipedia articles on this church do not mention amber, probably because it was a temporary exhibit that it was extended when I visited on June 10, 2015. There is only one mine of open-air amber in the eastern Baltic Sea located in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, at Iantarny. The exhibits came from this location, hence the subject of my photos. I found a source relating to this exhibition, Unique amber collection in exhibition Baltic Gold ”in Riga St. Peter's Church, should it be mentioned in the Wikipedia article in French. Best regards. Best regards..--Pierre André (talk) 15:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC) Understood. I'll look through this series soon, probably tomorrow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment I'm thinking maybe "on temporary exhibit" should be added to the scope. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Clarification on the scope "temporary exhibition".  Thank you.. --Pierre André (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Useful and a really nice piece. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)  Oppose There are two problems. The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. The framing of the image must be corrected, always remember that this image can be used in an article ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)  Done framing of the image and scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 11:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)