Comment We must attach the scope to the category that contains the picture and in this case to limit the "hand" because the foot can also be the object of this feature. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
I've simplified the scope. Yes one need a link, but only one ! Well, complicated... Anyway, I had a look to the category, and I would like you to explain, please, why you did chose this picture especially. Why should it be the "best in scope" ? Thanks. --Jebulon (talk) 00:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is there something missing in the 'reason' field above? It's clear, it's a useful illustration (judging by its popularity), and it's high-quality enough to be a FP. -- grendel|khan00:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
