Comment You are maybe right on the first half - the scope is canyon and the canyon could be non-important (unlike waterfall). The canyon didnt have a name on finnish topographic maps, so I called the scope "Pihtsusköngäs Canyon" after the waterfall above the canyon. Köngäs means "waterfall" in finnish, so it is probably wrong name for a canyon ;-) Pihtsusrotko or Pihtsuskuru or Pihtsuskanjoni would be better (the stream is called Pihtsusjohka, the lake above waterfall Pihtsusjärvi, etc). But it is just question of name and in fact it seems to me as non-important (or fixable). Maybe more important question is if the object itself is important (when it havent name in topographic map...)--Grtek (talk) 21:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
