In the category there are two more photos that are obviously taken at the same time with the nominated one. Just below the Summary boxes of both of them the quarter of Sellers home in London is specified by the author.--MrPanyGoff12:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support So I presume that the geolocation is only guessed, that it is a coarse one which doesn't point at the very house where Sellers was living at the time. That should be noted in the description. Otherwhise, the best one in the scope, birdie num num. --Myrabella (talk) 20:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that Peter Sellers is not among the notable residents in Belgravia listed in the :en:article. I would like to read a source confirming he lived there, because the flat in the background, in this photo and in the two others, seems rather modest (eg.), and Belgravia is known for "its immensely expensive residential properties" and to be "one of the wealthiest districts in the world". I wonder if it wouldn't have been a sort of joke between him and the photographer... --Myrabella (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
;) Note that the section Notable residents in this article is not referenced at all. It mentions about 50 names while probably thousands of public persons have dwelt in Belgravia throughout the years. These kind of Wikipedia sections are more or less in the scope of rumours. This picture can be used as the most reliable source for this particular article. As for the casual interior you are worried about, this is usual for some of the movie stars (and maybe most of them) to have not so big common cosy flats in the city which are used as secluded den. This info I read in many official biographies as is the case here.--MrPanyGoff09:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
