Commons:Valued image candidates/Maico 125 RS 2, Bj. 1970 (2007-06-15).JPG

Maico 125 RS 2, Bj. 1970 (2007-06-15).JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2018-02-04 21:26 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Maico racing motorcycles: Maico 125 RS 2, side-view
Used in	Global usage bg:Списък на мотоциклетни марки от Германия, cs:Maico, de:Maico, de:Maico 125 RS, it:Maico 125 RS, it:Maico, nl:Wereldkampioenschap wegrace 1970, nl:Börje Jansson, nl:Wegrace in de jaren 1970-1979
Review (criteria)	Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)  Oppose Bad editing, put original. --Mile (talk) 08:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment Laughable! I will show a bike and not the disturbing surroundings. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment Petar's comment is not laughable. We may not agree with his oppose vote, but we should respect his interpretation of VI guideline No. 3 No distracting, irrelevant elements and The image must look good on-screen at the review size Charles (talk) 10:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Does it not look good on screen? I can not imagine that the image would be better or more expressive with the distracting car in the background. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Look here for example. Is this image really better? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC) I did not give an opinion. I was defending Petar's freedom to oppose and criticising your 'laughable' comment. Charles (talk) 12:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Lothar Spurzem, no matter what, keep originals as originals. I realized that with time. Sometime editing fail and thats why. Also have them in some disc for future. I made scheisse to many often, so i learnt not to overrite originals. I think background shouldnt be such disturbing, at least on VI. Otherwise, dont select space, but use "Blur tool" and select "Soft round" (its icon bellow "Gradient") --Mile (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)  Support The main motif is sharp. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)