Commons:Valued image candidates/Lepilemur mustelinus 1868.jpg

Lepilemur mustelinus 1868.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Totodu74 (talk) on 2011-03-31 19:29 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Lepilemur mustelinus (Weasel Sportive Lemur)
Used in	Global usage 7 uses in Main of 7 wikipedias (for Lepilemur mustelinus)
Reason	Give a full vision of the animal, high definition, and... alone in the scope. -- Totodu74 (talk)
Review (criteria)	Info it is necessary to add drawing in the scope. To avoid penalizing the view "in vivo" or naturalized form --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)  Done Okay, if it's necessary, but we don't have (yet ?) any in vivo picture so I took a scope as broad as possible. Totodu74 (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC) Cf. lower  Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)  Comment About drawing vs photograph subscope, a previous discussion: Commons:Valued image candidates/Pseudimbrasia deyrollei.jpg, and an older one: Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list/Archive 5, see the discussion "When are species subscopes warranted?". Just for the record, I won't stress on this point. By the way, vernacular name in English should be in the scope, I've added it. --Myrabella (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)  Temporary opposition per discussion on Commons:Valued image candidates/Pseudimbrasia deyrollei.jpg. Please generalize the scope and drop the 'drawing' part. (note: I'm sometimes offline for several days, if the scope is altered you may consider my opposition void). Taxocat (talk) 07:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Scope fixed. --Taxocat (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Re- Done, since Archaeodontosaurus seemed to be convinced on Commons:Valued image candidates/Pseudimbrasia deyrollei.jpg. Totodu74 (talk) 12:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)  Support all criteria met. --Taxocat (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC)  Oppose I do not share this opinion. There will be conflict between the drawings and photographs. Both deserve to be awarded in their category. I maintain that we must add drawing. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC) I am satisfied with the discussion we had. I raise my negative vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)  Oppose Per Archaeodontosaurus arguments. I think this point is very important.I'll remove my opposition if done.--Jebulon (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC) I remove my opposition, due to the debate. Agree with Yann below regarding a possible future MVR with a photo.--Jebulon (talk) 07:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)  Support either scope above. Walter Siegmund (talk) 23:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)  Support fine like this. Open a MVR the day we get a photograph. Yann (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 0 oppose => promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)