Comment Here the camera without accessories will be shown, which is a difference, please pay attention to the scope. Thank you. --Jean11 (talk) 11:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I´m surprised, the backside of a camera, even when it is the same model is a completely different skope of an objekts. Therefore it is ok to nominate it. --Hubertl13:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Hubertl: A separate scope for the backside is fine. I think Yann is referring to this nomination, which is also a back view. As the idea behind VI is to provide re-users with a "if in doubt, pick this one" kind of information, I totally agree with the intention to keep the number of sub-scopes for a given subject on the low side. Overly specific sub-scopes (e.g. one with and one without lens cap) are somewhat contrary to the purpose of VI. Personally, I'd prefer this one as the "backside" VI, as it seems to be the default configuration. --El Grafo (talk) 14:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
