temporary Oppose: @Dnalor 01: there are lots of redundancies in the proposed scope, and there's no need to describe the subject in the scope. For instance, the scope for this VI is simply Extra 300, not something like Extra 300 aerobatic low wing single-engine propeller aircraft, as that's all already implied by the type of aircraft. There's also no need to add a "front view" for a main scope nomination, as that's the only side of the cartridge that's really of interest to anyone. (That's all with a big IMHO, of course.) I'd support in a heartbeat if we could agree on something like Kodacolor II 135-20, cartridge. for the scope. --El Grafo (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
