Commons:Valued image candidates/Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian-S. Bistgaun, Dardin. (actm) 22.jpg

Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian-S. Bistgaun, Dardin. (actm) 22.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2019-01-01 07:16 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian-S. Bistgaun, Dardin Remembrance stone before Can Dr. Gion G. Cahannes and Dec. Bistgaun F. Catomen.
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Question notability? Charles (talk) 10:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC) Answer: When we took pictures in and around the church, we were shown around. by the sexton. She said that the lower person had been a pastor of the church. And the upper person had meant a lot to the parish. due to a misunderstanding, the graves and gravestones of the gentlemen have been cleared away. After that it was decided to place a memorial stone in the wall.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment There is no requirement in COM:VICR for notability. That's a Wikipedia concept unrelated to the idea of a valued image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment - No, not there, because that page is about criteria for judging photos within a scope and more or less assumes that the scope is OK already. Look at Commons:Valued image scope#Examples of suitable scopes. If there were no limits for notability, then literally every object could have a VI scope. Also, look at the "Buildings" and "Works of art" sections of that page. There's an annoying fact, though: In practice, a lot of these limitations are not followed, but my repeated requests to change these guidelines to reflect actual practice have been fruitless (I guess I could start a thread proposing specific changes, and maybe I should, but I think the proposal would be ignored in favor of just continuing to muddle through with a subcultural practice of VIC regulars, regardless of what's actually on that page). Nevertheless, there is a line somewhere, and the only question is not whether there is one but where it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC) I would welcome a debate on VI guidelines Ikan Kekek. Charles (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC) Alright, I'll give it some thought. Thanks, Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC) I would also welcome such a debate. Martinvl (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)