Commons:Valued image candidates/Körperich Niedersgegen Sankt Dionysius.jpg

Körperich Niedersgegen Sankt Dionysius.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-02-09 10:17 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St. Dionysius Church in Niedersgegen, Germany (southwest view).
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Best in Scope -- Jim Evans (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)  Oppose File:St. Dionysius (Niedersgegen) 01.jpg more suitable to illustrate the church from afar. -- Chris06 (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment I agree with Chris06. Somehow I overlooked that image. But, I don't know how to withdraw my support. -- Jim Evans (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment Dear Jim Evans, no problem, I've just helped you to withdraw your support. May I explain that the above-mentioned alternative does not concentrate on the church but also on the "Schlossgut Petry" which is a separate building. --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Very good and useful image,  Best in Scope: very good lighting, correct colors, good perspective, no distracting other parts -- Spurzem (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Respectfully  Oppose, as I think File:St. Dionysius (Niedersgegen) 02.jpg is best in scope: It's better lit, shows more of the building and is more clearly separated from all other buildings. The nominated photo would be best in scope if we restrict the scope to the facade of the church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment @ Ikan Kekek Yes, that's right, the one you mention is better than File:St. Dionysius (Niedersgegen) (2) (cropped).JPG anyway. But it's a different view direction. Maybe I should have mentioned the view direction from the file description of the nominated image in the scope. Do you think I alter the scope accordingly? --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment You could; that's another way to limit the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC) I think so too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Scope changed as discussed. @ Spurzem, Jim Evans, Ikan Kekek, Archaeodontosaurus, please have another look. Thanks! --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Perfect for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)  Support I'm good with this, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Me too --Jim Evans (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC) Result: 4 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)