Commons:Valued image candidates/Hansestadt Lubeck Tatiana Yagunova Watercolor painting 2014.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hansestadt Lubeck Tatiana Yagunova Watercolor painting 2014.jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by Niklitov (talk) on 2017-08-29 16:11 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2012 watercolor paintings of Lübeck
Used in

Global usage

w:en:Template:Hanseatic League as main city of the Hanseatic League
Reason Good quality, lovely for templates and articles (about Hanseatic League, ect.), big work. Quality improvement wiki articles. -- Niklitov (talk)
Review
(criteria)
  •  Comment What period does this picture represent? The purpose of VI is to catalogue images that are useful, not images that are artistic. If you could link this image to a particular era it might well be valuable, but it would have to compete with paintings, photographs etc without regard to the actual medium. I suggest that the scope should be changed to "Lubeck in the [early/mid/late] XXth Century" (where XXth means 18th, 19th or 20th as appropriate) Martinvl (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Changed category to the actual medium: 2012 watercolor paintings of Lübeck (part of Category:2012 in Lübeck). Right? — Niklitov (talk) 22:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that there is a copyright problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Dear Archaeodontosaurus! Do we need to get OTRS permission? We have confirmation from the author and photographer in one person. Please find example: File:Taran Lighthouse Kalinigrad Oblast Tatiana Yagunova Watercolor painting.jpg. Best Regards, — OTRS Member, Niklitov (talk) 08:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is desirable for you to have the ORTS certificate, I understood the context but some inattentive person could ask for an erasure of the imge which is always disagreeable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose I don't like the scope. Charles (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]