Commons:Valued image candidates/Gele korstzwam (Stereum hirsutum) 30-12-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gele korstzwam (Stereum hirsutum) 30-12-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

undecided
Image
Nominated by Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-02-07 06:14 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stereum hirsutum (false turkey tail) on dead wood.
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)
  •  Comment One remark on the substance and one on the form. You must have a much better result by diaphragm a little more and in 3 images instead of 18, because you increase the errors of reconstruction. You are also embarrassed by too much humidity which affects definition. The subject is a juvenile who does not show too much the shaggy side which is supposed to characterize him. But for "juvenile" its should suffice. If you did that on the pitch you must have spent a lot of time there. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comments. If I translate it with Google Translate, I cannot find out what you mean. I think it is better that I withdraw the nomination.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "diaphragm"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Plus on empile d’image plus il y a de risque de mauvaise reconstruction. F5.6 les ‘’tranches’’ sont trop étroite il faut F14 pour être tranquille avec un flash annulaire ou deux flash latéraux, faciles à amener que le terrain. L’image est bonne pour VI pour un juvénile (The more images you stack, the greater the risk of poor reconstruction. F5.6 The "slices" are too narrow it takes F14 to be quiet with a ring flash or two side flashes, easy to bring into the wild. The image is good for VI for a juvenile.) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Note: The mushroom is wet. It was rainy during the period. then the fungus no longer becomes dry. I have not used a flash.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I saw the difficult conditions very well, which make the shaggy character difficult to see. You will not regret the use of side flashes that will facilitate your work. Another possibility for this type of small specimen: you can take the branch and bring it with you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your explanations and recommendations.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]