I could add "botanical illustration" in scope, but there are much more astonishing botanical illustrations than this one, which is rather dull due to its subject. If you mean Category:Chamaeranthemum - botanical illustration, maybe it's a bit early for that, when we only have one image for everything on this genus. Or perhaps I misunderstood what you meant?--DarwinAhoy!13:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We hope to have quickly, a photograph of a living specimen. To avoid future discussions it is easier to add "drawing" in scope. For the name: the subspecies being visually different it is good to give the full name of the subspecies represented. The scope could be: « Chamaeranthemum beyrichii var. rotundifolium », drawing. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've made the changes you requested, please see if everything is ok now. I'm new to this, and thought that since it's the only available picture for the whole genus, it would be better to use it as scope. I've searched flickr for this genus, and there are some images there, although with an unfree license, so there's not really that impossible that there could be an image of a real plant in the near future here in Commons.--DarwinAhoy!18:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
