Comment I am not a specialist, but I would advance that the chosen scope seems too narrow. I would suggest to change it to "Pit stops in Formula One", with a link to the fitting category. New competitors may exist within that suggested widener scope—sportive spirit, indeed! --Myrabella (talk) 12:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, it wasn't an attempatative to remove the sportive spirit. The thing is that this is one of my first post in the VI section ;). Fale (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Oh, my fault! I only tried to say that it would be sportive to change the scope even knowing that it could be more difficult. I am truly sorry for this misunderstanding. Thanks for the change; I hope that this new scope will attract some more reviewers :-) --Myrabella (talk) 16:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Probably I posted a 'too strong' answer, because I understood you were not pointing to a bad-faith act :). I hope too that in this way it will attract more reviewers :) Fale (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I hesitate with that one. More men in action, perhaps more illustrative (one can understand what is that distracting "fishing rod" across the nominated image) but I like the composition of yours. I'd set up a MVR if the "opponent" was geocoded (rather easy to do, I guess). --Myrabella (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
